Michael T. Brannick
Clinical Psychology · 2005–2017
A researcher in the Science corpus: 11 papers; trusts 23 researchers and is trusted by 52 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Clinical Psychology — 61 citations into it; #4,592 of 8,024 by trust here, #2,600 by citations
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management — 59 citations into it; #3,757 of 8,741 by trust here, #3,032 by citations
- Social Psychology — 46 citations into it
- Sociology and Political Science — 36 citations into it; #1,278 of 22,756 by trust here, #2,063 by citations
- Statistics and Probability — 30 citations into it; #11,107 of 12,932 by trust here, #2,069 by citations
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 25 citations into it
- Applied Psychology — 20 citations into it
- Management Science and Operations Research — 12 citations into it; #11,293 of 11,946 by trust here, #2,873 by citations
Whom Michael T. Brannick trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- C. Lance
- L. M. Hough
- Jesús Salgado
- Michael K. Lindell
- Deniz S. Ones
- C. Viswesvaran
- W. Viechtbauer
- T. Judge
- Julian P. T. Higgins
- Tom A. B. Snijders
Who trusts Michael T. Brannick overall
- Bangcheng Liu
- Jeremy B. Bernerth
- Naresh K. Malhotra
- Kevin D. Carlson
- Melissa S. Cardon
- K. Devine
- Herman Aguinis
- Marcia P. Miceli
- Dawn S. Carlson
- Allison S. Gabriel
Papers from Michael T. Brannick's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Michael T. Brannick trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
- PERSONALITY MEASURES AS PREDICTORS OF JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYTIC REVIEW
- The structure, measurement, validity, and use of personality variables in industrial, work, and organizational psychology.
- Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analysis. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
- How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (Statistics in Medicine)
- Random Effects Models
- Determinants, Detection and Amelioration of Adverse Impact in Personnel Selection Procedures: Issues, Evidence and Lessons Learned
- Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
- The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: a qualitative and quantitative review. (Psychological bulletin)
Their papers
- Methodological Urban Legends: The Misuse of Statistical Control Variables (2011) — 1,127 citations
- Motive, role identity, and prosocial personality as predictors of volunteer activity (2005) — 338 citations
- What Is Method Variance and How Can We Cope With It? A Panel Discussion (2010) — 300 citations
- Meta-analytic Reviews in the Organizational Sciences: Two Meta-analytic Schools on the Way to MARS (the Meta-analytic Reporting Standards) (2013) — 213 citations
- How similar are personality scales of the “same” construct? A meta-analytic investigation (2010) — 131 citations
- Applying theories of Institutional Helping to Informal Volunteering: Motives, role identity, and prosocial personality (2007) — 125 citations
- Sleep, Cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2017) — 594 citations
- The Team Personality–Team Performance Relationship Revisited: The Impact of Criterion Choice, Pattern of Workflow, and Method of Aggregation (2009) — 98 citations
- Common method variance or measurement bias? The problem and possible solutions (2009) — 109 citations
- A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Job Applicant Faking on Personality Measures (2006) — 405 citations
- The Influence of Sociocultural Factors on Body Image: A Meta‐Analysis (2006) — 465 citations