Abusive Supervision: A Meta-Analysis and Empirical Review

655 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Examining the impact of abusive supervision on employees’ psychological wellbeing and turnover intention: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation (2020, background): “The destructive impacts of abusive supervision on representatives’ working environment perspectives and practices have been generally shown by earlier examination (Mackey et al., 2017).”
Moving from Abuse to Reconciliation: A Power-Dependence Perspective on When and How a Follower Can Break the Spiral of Abuse (2017, methodology): “We heed the call by abusive supervision scholars to rely on longitudinal, time-lagged designs to highlight and test the directionality of proposed effects between key variables (Lian et al., 2014; Mackey et al., 2015; Martinko et al., 2013; Tepper, 2007).”
When Victims Help Their Abusive Supervisors: The Role of LMX, Self-Blame, and Guilt (2020, background): “…measured supervisor-directed blame, anger, and supervisor-directed deviance because we were interested in alternative pathways through which abusive supervision may affect an established supervisor-directed outcome of abusive supervision (i.e., supervisor-directed deviance; Mackey et al., 2017).”