Multiple reference points in satisfaction and fairness assessment
By Lisa D. Ordóñez, Terry Connolly, Richard S. Coughlan. 2000
219 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0277c549dfbe36acae9dfe106a9210d9f764614
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Decision Sciences
- Jochen Wirtz
- Sheryl E. Kimes
- Robyn A LeBoeuf
- Joseph G. Johnson
- Maurice E. Schweitzer
- Eldar Shafir
- Stefan T. Trautmann
- K. B. Monroe
In Marketing
- Jochen Wirtz
- Sheryl E. Kimes
- Kineta Hung
- K. Chan
- C. K. Yim
- Joseph G. Johnson
- Maurice E. Schweitzer
- Jennifer L. Cox
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- K. Chan
- C. K. Yim
- Kineta Hung
- Jochen Wirtz
- Maurice E. Schweitzer
- Jennifer L. Cox
- Stefan T. Trautmann
- Donald E. Gibson
Citations in the corpus
- The Price is Unfair! A Conceptual Framework of Price Fairness Perceptions (2004, background): “That is, for an equivalent magnitude of price inequality, we expect to observe a smaller degree of perceived unfairness when the inequality is to the buyer’s advantage than when it is to the buyer’s disadvantage (Ordóñez, Connolly, and Coughlan 2000).”
- Fairness, Feelings, and Ethical Decision- Making: Consequences of Violating Community Standards of Fairness (2007, background): “When individuals perceive outcomes to be fair, they experience satisfaction (Hegtvedt and Killian, 1999; Ordonez et al., 2000) and are likely to be supportive of both the outcome and the parties involved (Barry and Oliver, 1996).”
- A tractable model of process fairness under risk (2009, result): “Empirical results reported in Ordonez, Connolly, and Coughlan (2000) support the assumption of multiple comparisons assumed in the Fehr–Schmidt framework.”
- Deep thoughts and shallow frames; on the susceptibility to framing effects. (2003, background): “…even when aware of multiple frames, people typically are unable to amalgamate these frames into a unified representation, and instead are pulled back and forth between impulses triggered by the alternate frames (Kahneman & Tversky, 1984; Tversky & Kahneman, 1986; see also Ordóñez et al., 2000).”
- Multiple reference effects in service evaluations: Roles of alternative attractiveness and self-image congruity (2007, background): “(Ordonez et al. 2000) The intuition that outcome evaluations are shaped by comparisons to reference points has been widely adopted to model how consumers behave in various contexts.”
- The Moderating Role of Familiarity in Fairness Perceptions of Revenue Management Pricing (2007, background): “…that for an equivalent magnitude of price inequality, there will be a smaller degree of perceived unfairness (if any at all) when the inequality is to the buyer's advantage than when it is to his or her disadvantage (Martins 1995; Ordofiez, Connolly, and Coughlan 2000; Xia, Monroe, and Cox 2004).”
- The Use of Multiple Reference Points in Risky Decision Making (2012, background): “For instance, even while people can feel positively relative to one reference point like the SQ, they may feel negatively relative to an aspiration (Ordóñez et al., 2000).”