A tractable model of process fairness under risk

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A glimpse through the veil of ignorance: equality of opportunity and support for redistribution (2010, methodology): “This is not the case under the process Fehr–Schmidt model considered by Trautmann (2009), which provides a simple way to allow for the “equality of opportunity” effect.”
Risk attitudes in a social context (2011, background): “In most of the literature the way to analyze social preferences is to let people play a game such as a dictator game or an ultimatum game (Bolton et al. 2005; Charness and Rabin 2002; Kami et al. 2008; Sebald 2007; Trautmann 2009).”
‘Give me a chance!’ An experiment in social decision under risk (2010, methodology): “This is true in particular for the “process Fehr-Schmidt model” ( Trautmann 2009 ).”
Dictating the Risk: Experimental Evidence on Giving in Risky Environments (2013, background): “Although being a fair procedure, as it gives both children the same chance to win, it will not result in a fair outcome as only one child can receive the treat (see also Kircher, Ludwig and Sandroni (2009); Trautmann (2009)).”