Deep thoughts and shallow frames; on the susceptibility to framing effects.

By Robyn A LeBoeuf, Eldar Shafir. 2003

239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ead5ec609a3efd0990a59e42d6df7cff8f2b50a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In General Decision Sciences

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. (2007, methodology): “However, these beneficial effects of need for cognition have not been found in other studies looking at framing (LeBoeuf & Shafir, 2003; Levin et al., 2002) and confidence assessment (Jonsson & Allwood, 2003; Wolfe & Grosch, 1990).”
A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. (2003, background): “Because 90% short-term survival is less threatening than 10% immediate mortality, the survival frame yielded a substantially higher preference for surgery.”
On the failure of cognitive ability to predict myside and one-sided thinking biases (2008, background): “…paradigm, because it is run within subjects, contains cues that might help participants interpret what the experimenter might deem optimal performance (see Fischhoff, Slovic, & Lichtenstein, 1979; Kahneman, 2000; Kahneman & Frederick, 2002, 2005; Kahneman & Tversky, 1996; LeBoeuf & Shafir, 2003).”
Discount Rates for Time versus Dates: The Sensitivity of Discounting to Time-Interval Description (2006, background): “However, given that even simple frames (e.g., a 50% chance of success) do not often engender conversion (e.g., Levin, Schnittjer, and Thee 1988) and that even effortful thought does not reduce framing effects (LeBoeuf and Shafir 2003), such unprompted conversions may be rare.”
MAPS OF BOUNDED RATIONALITY: A PERSPECTIVE ON INTUITIVE JUDGMENT AND CHOICE (2003, background): “This aspect of the demonstration is spoiled for the reader who sees the two versions in close proximity, but when the two lines are shown separately, observers will not spontaneously become aware of the alternative interpretation.”
Effects of Attribute Framing on Cognitive Processing and Evaluation (2004, background): “…tasks, a facilitating effect of more detailed processing should be more likely than an inhibiting or biasing effect (e.g., Au et al., 2003; Cacioppo et al., 1996; Huber & Seiser, 2001; Langer, 1989b; LeBoeuf & Shafir, 2003; Levin, Huneke, & Jasper, 2000; Louis & Sutton, 1991; Reger & Palmer, 1996).”