Contextual factors of psychological empowerment

By Marc Siegall, S. Gardner. 2000

267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d9368c38591b8e390371b1996524fdfe445281a5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Antecedents and Consequences of Psychological Empowerment: The Case of Taiwan's Hotel Companies (2008, background): “…of the literature shows that job satisfaction, job motivation, productiveness, effectiveness, organizational commitment, and turnover have been studied as potential consequences of empowerment (Gagne et al., 1997; Kirkman & Rosen, 1999; Liden et al., 2000; Siegall & Gardner, 2000; Sparrowe, 1994).”
EMPLOYEE EMPOWERMENT IN THE GREEK CONTEXT (2005, background): “However, all of these measures have been developed in North America and establishing universal applicability requires their validation in other cultural settings; furthermore, “the discriminant validity of the (Spreitzer) scales needs work” ( Siegall and Gardner, 2000”
Public service motivation and performance: The role of organizational identification (2018, result): “…not surprising considering that previous studies demonstrated that the levels of independence and freedom that employees have in determining what they do in their job is related to higher levels of organizational identification (Zhang & Chen, 2013) and performance (Siegall & Gardner, 2000).”
Empowerment—Fad or Fab? A Multilevel Review of the Past Two Decades of Research (2012, background): “For example, Siegall and Gardner (2000) found that communication with one’s supervisor was positively associated with the meaning, self-determination, and impact dimensions of psychological empowerment.”
Psychological Empowerment and Job Satisfaction (2009, background): “Psychological empowerment is defined as a set of motivational cognitions shaped by a work environment and reflecting an individual’s active orientation to his or her work role (Spreitzer, 1995). Building on the work of Conger and Kanungo (1988), Thomas and Velthouse (1990) argued that four cognitive”
Examining a Positive Psychological Role for Performance Measures (2014, unknown): “PE is influenced by organizational environment (Siegall and Gardner, 2000), and providing managers with relevant performance information will increase feelings of PE (Drake, Wong and Salter, 2007; Spreitzer, 1995).”
The organizational empowerment scale (2003, methodology): “FIS is the third factor conceptually linked to the macro-organizational facilitation of empowerment, and it is defined as occurring when all information concerning the company is accessible to all individuals in the company (Conger and Kanungo, 1988; Randolph, 1995; Siegall and Gardner, 2000).”
The effects of employee empowerment on employee job satisfaction: A study on hotels in Turkey (2011, background): “Entrepreneurs, managers and researchers in the field of management regard the employee as the major resource bringing competitive advantage to establishments, and they are of the opinion that the involvement and empowerment of employees is key to the success of establishments (Etzioni, 1961; Siegall”
The impact of leader's humor on employees' psychological empowerment: the moderating role of tenure (2011, background): “However, the majority of these empirical studies are concerned with demographic variables (Dimitriades and Kufidu, 2004; Hancer and George, 2003) or organizational factors (Bordin et al., 2007; Siegall and Gardner, 2000).”