EMPLOYEE EMPOWERMENT IN THE GREEK CONTEXT

By Zoe S. Dimitriades. 2005

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f245dc0af5b6e1394771d0c4cd45e6b018ed8aa1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. J. Bester
2. L. V. Zyl
3. F. Lloréns-Montes
4. Irene Huertas-Valdivia
5. A. R. Gallego-Burín
6. Marius W. Stander

In Social Psychology

1. L. V. Zyl
2. F. Lloréns-Montes
3. Irene Huertas-Valdivia
4. A. R. Gallego-Burín
5. Marius W. Stander

In Strategy and Management

1. J. Bester
2. L. V. Zyl
3. F. Lloréns-Montes
4. Irene Huertas-Valdivia
5. A. R. Gallego-Burín
6. Marius W. Stander

Citations in the corpus

• Transformational leadership and followers' attitudes: the mediating role of psychological empowerment (2008, unknown): “ThevalidityandreliabilityofMenon’s(2001) instrumenthasbeentestedinvariousstudies(Menon2001;Congeretal.2000;Dimitriades2005).”
• Effects of different leadership styles on hospitality workers (2019, methodology): “In fact, some previous researchers using Spreitzer's (1995) scale omitted some of the construct’s dimensions from the analysis due to similar problems (e.g., competence, in Albrecht and Andreetta (2011); and self-determination, in Dimitriades (2005) and Jose and Mampilly (2014).”
• Leadership empowering behaviour, psychological empowerment, organisational citizenship behaviours and turnover intention in a manufacturing division (2015, background): “Dimitriades (2005), Fulford and Enz (1995), Hancer and George (2003) and Kraimer, Seibert and Linden (1999) suggest that selfdetermination and impact have something in common that is not shared with the other dimensions of the questionnaire.”