Abusive supervision and subordinates' organizational citizenship behavior.

By Kelly L. Zellars, Bennett J. Tepper, M. Duffy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002

934 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d46bc8a16d6b199d207a41abfe264ad09400ef38

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Developing a model for the influence of perceived organizational climate on organizational citizenship behaviour and organizational performance based on balanced score card (2014, background): “…about 30 different types of potential behaviours (Podsakoff et al., 2000), but the most reliable classification about organizational citizenship behaviour is offered by Organ (Nadiri and Tanova, 2010; Zellars et al., 2002) as civic virtue, altruism, conscientiousness, sportsmanship, and courtesy.”
Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees' workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis (2009, background): “…literature suggest that abused subordinates will retaliate by withholding citizenship performance (Aryee et al., 2007, Burris et al., 2008, Zellars et al., 2002), actions that benefit the organization but whose omission is not punishable (e.g., helping coworkers, behaving courteously,…”
Abusive supervision climate: : A multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes (2014, background): “Controlling for employee age, gender (Bamberger & Bacharach, 2006; Thau, Bennett, Mitchell, & Marrs, 2009; Zellars et al., 2002), and individual perceptions of abusive supervision ( .94), regression analyses demonstrated that abusive supervision climate was significantly related to each of the…”
Abusive Supervision in Work Organizations: Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda (2007, background): “Abusive supervision research has been conducted with samples representing a variety of industries including the military (Zellars et al., 2002), paramilitary (Duffy et al., 2002; Thau & Mitchell, 2006), telecommunications (Aryee et al. 2007), automotive (Harris et al., in press), and customer…”
The Dark Side of Leadership: A Three-Level Investigation of the Cascading Effect of Abusive Supervision on Employee Creativity (2012, background): “…has demonstrated that exposure to abusive supervision results in subordinates’ unwillingness to “go the extra mile” to perform behaviors that benefit their organizations (e.g., Zellars et al., 2002), which may involve advancing creative ideas and solutions that improve organizational effectiveness.”
Abusive Supervision and Contextual Performance: The Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion and the Moderating Role of Work Unit Structure (2008, background): “abusive supervision and citizenship behaviours (Aryee et al., 2007; Tepper, 2000; Zellars et al., 2002), our findings further revealed these relationships to be indi-”
Redrawing the boundaries of OCB? An empirical examination of compulsory extra-role behavior in the workplace (2007, background): “This last observation has recently been challenged by Zellars et al. (2002) and Tepper et al. (2004), who raised the possibility of abusive supervision in the workplace.”
Examining the impact of abusive supervision on employees’ psychological wellbeing and turnover intention: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation (2020, background): “…illustrates long-term emotional or mental harassment of subordinates through actions such as teasing subordinates in front of others, required concealment details, and the use of derogatory words, demands, and bogart tactics (Zellars et al., 2002), all encountered over a long period (Tepper, 2000).”
From Ineffectiveness to Destruction: A Qualitative Study on the Meaning of Negative Leadership (2009, background): “Closely related to this line of research, Tepper and his colleagues (e.g., Tepper, 2000; 2007; Tepper et al., 2006; Zellars et al., 2002) have summarized different approaches like undermining (Duffy et al., 2002), bullying (Hoel et al., 1999), and abuse (Keashly, 1998; Keashly et al., 1994) in the…”