Team mental models and team performance: a field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy
By Beng-Chong Lim, Katherine J Klein. 2006
653 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Control and Systems Engineering, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1dd8d5f646d7dc5526b79386d803124593635daf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- John E. Mathieu
- Susan Mohammed
- M. Maynard
- Scott I. Tannenbaum
- Lucy L. Gilson
- Lionel P. Robert Jr.
- Alan R. Dennis
- Lori A. Ferzandi
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Lucy L. Gilson
- Katherine Hamilton
- Petra Badke-Schaub
- Jessica Mesmer-Magnus
- Eduardo Salas
- Andre Neumann
- Susan Mohammed
- Leslie A. DeChurch
In Social Psychology
- John E. Mathieu
- Leslie A. DeChurch
- Susan Mohammed
- Jessica Mesmer-Magnus
- M. Maynard
- Katherine Hamilton
- Eduardo Salas
- Lori A. Ferzandi
Citations in the corpus
- Guided Team Self-Correction (2008, background): “Effective teamwork processes have previously been linked to both shared (e.g., Mathieu et al., 2000) and accurate (e.g., Hirschfeld et al., 2006; Lim & Klein, 2005; Mathieu et al., 2005) mental models of teamwork.”
- Mental models in design teams: a valid approach to performance in design collaboration? (2007, methodology): “Although the components of mental models can be requested directly from knowledgeable participants, relevant content is generally supplied by the researcher in most existing team mental model studies (e.g. Edwards et al. 2006, Ellis 2006, Lim and Klein 2006, Mathieu et al. 2000).”
- The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis. (2010, methodology): “Cognitive similarity–congruence refers to the extent to which teammates’ cognitive structures match one another, whereas cognitive accuracy refers to the extent to which teammates’ mental models match “correct” or target cognitive structures (Lim & Klein, 2006; Rent-sch & Hall, 1994).”
- Social Capital and Knowledge Integration in Digitally Enabled Teams (2008, background): “Shared mental models enable high-performing teams to coordinate their efforts without a need to communicate overtly (Lim and Klein 2006, Edwards et al. 2006, Mathieu et al. 2005, Mathieu et al. 2000, Cannon-Bowers et al. 1993).”
- Contemplating Mindfulness at Work (2016, methodology): “This question could be addressed by a study examining the effects of mindfulness on the development of individual mental models as well as the extent to which they were accurate and similar to others in the team (per Lim & Klein, 2006).”
- Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate: Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming (2018, background): “…basis of human-human interactions, including our understanding of situation awareness (Gorman, Cooke, & Winner, 2006), teamwork and taskwork knowledge (Lim & Klein, 2006), transactive memory (Moreland, 1999), and team cognition (Cooke, 2015; Cooke, Gorman, Myers, & Duran, 2013) in all-human teams.”
- HRM practices and knowledge sharing: an empirical study (2011, background): “Furthermore, it was elaborated by Lim and Klein (2006)”
- Ambivalence in Organizations: A Multilevel Approach (2014, background): “…collective-level cognitions and emotions provides examples of collective cognitive phenomena such as team mental models (Klimoski and Mohammed 1994, Lim and Klein 2006), collective interpretations (Isabella 1990), and intersubjectivity (Ashforth et al. 2011, Wiley 1988) and collective emotional…”
- Interactive Effects of Team and Task Shared Mental Models as Related to Air Traffic Controllers' Collective Efficacy and Effectiveness (2009, background): “Whether such quality is gauged relative to an expert’s model (e.g., Edwards et al., 2006; Lim & Klein, 2006), against multiple normative comparisons (e.g., Mathieu et al., 2005), or evaluated by subject matter experts (e.g., Marks et al., 2000), in many cases the influence of SMMs is not simply a…”
- Shared work values and team member effectiveness: The mediation of trustfulness and trustworthiness (2008, background): “…mental models have been proven to benefit team performance in a variety of areas, such as quality, efficiency, operational readiness, and points earned in the combat simulation (Cannon & Edmondson, 2001; Lim & Klein, 2006; Marks et al., 2001, 2002; Mathieu et al., 2000; Smith-Jentsch et al., 2005).”