Consequences of Workplace Bullying on Employee Identification and Satisfaction Among Australians and Singaporeans
By Jennifer M. I. Loh, S. Restubog, Thomas J. Zagenczyk. 2010
140 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b9eaceab0e75cffc7631cbd33239845cc126876d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- David Holman
- Rolf van Dick
- Johannes Ullrich
- Lynn Bowes-Sperry
- J. León-Pérez
- Alicia Arenas
- Gabriele Giorgi
- Bahaudin G. Mujtaba
In Social Psychology
- David Holman
- J. Escartín
- Céleste M. Brotheridge
- Rolf van Dick
- Johannes Ullrich
- Dieter Zapf
- Nikos Bozionelos
- E. Schlüter
In Sociology and Political Science
- Rolf van Dick
- Dieter Zapf
- David Holman
- J. Escartín
- Céleste M. Brotheridge
- Nikos Bozionelos
- Carolyn M. Axtell
- Johannes Ullrich
Citations in the corpus
- Individual‐ and group‐level effects of social identification on workplace bullying (2013, methodology): “Mael and Ashforth’s (1992) sixitem measure of identification was used.”
- Acceptability of workplace bullying: A comparative study on six continents (2013, background): “One method to reduce the number of confounds is to use a behaviorally based scale such as NAQ-R which allows for a focus on the acceptability of behaviors.”
- Are Bullying Behaviors Tolerated in Some Cultures? Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Workplace Bullying and Job Satisfaction Among Italian Workers (2015, background): “Although this result seems to contradict previous studies in domain of bullying (e.g., Bowling and Beehr 2006; Loh et al. 2010), cultural factors together with coping and motivation literatures can help to explain this apparently counterintuitive finding.”