Public Service Motivation Measurement

By David H. Coursey, Sanjay K. Pandey. 2007

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a24240b88f4c24457b82db5f6223f1f293365ac4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. A. Kjeldsen
2. Bangcheng Liu
3. C. Jacobsen
4. L. B. Andersen
5. Wei Yu
6. W. Vandenabeele
7. Kaifeng Yang
8. J. Perry

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Kaifeng Yang
2. L. B. Andersen
3. A. Kjeldsen
4. Bangcheng Liu
5. C. Jacobsen
6. Wei Yu
7. W. Vandenabeele
8. J. Caillier

In Public Administration

1. Bangcheng Liu
2. A. Kjeldsen
3. C. Jacobsen
4. Kaifeng Yang
5. L. B. Andersen
6. Wei Yu
7. W. Vandenabeele
8. J. Perry

Citations in the corpus

• Public Service Motivation, User Orientation, and Job Satisfaction: A Question of Employment Sector? (2013, methodology): “We used an abbreviated version of Perry’s (1996) multidimensional measurement instrument validated by Coursey and Pandey (2007) and Wright and Christensen (2009), who distinguish between three dimensions of PSM: public interest, compassion, and attraction to policymaking.”
• Public Service Motivation and Employment Sector: Attraction or Socialization? (2013, methodology): “This dimension is closely related to the public interest dimension (Perry, 1996, p. 19), which is why it is often omitted or collapsed with this dimension (Coursey & Pandey, 2007; Vandenabeele, 2008b; Wright, 2008).”
• Development of a Public Service Motivation Measurement Scale: Corroborating and Extending Perry's Measurement Instrument (2008, methodology): “Therefore, a quest for a shortened scale has been undertaken by some (Coursey and Pandey 2007; Coursey and Perry forthcoming), in order to develop a less elaborated set of items measuring PSM. Based upon the first two research questions, two hypotheses are formulated.”
• Work-Related Stressors and Health-Related Outcomes in Public Service (2015, background): “As a native concept in the public management literature, red tape characterizes the burdensome rules and procedures that constrain and regulate the activities of public servants (Coursey & Pandey, 2007).”
• The mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on self-reported performance: more robust evidence of the PSM—performance relationship (2009, methodology): “Given that the Perry (1996) instrument could not be easily replicated outside the United States (Castaing, 2006; Vandenabeele, 2008a), cross-validation of the instrument is necessary whenever it is applied in fundamentally different settings (Coursey and Pandey, 2007).”