Developing a multiple foci conceptualization of the psychological contract
By A. Marks. 2001
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99327386296d2100dcc3feeb098a9390ac02667e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- M. Bolino
- W. H. Turnley
- C. Atkinson
- Wayne O'Donohue
- Fernando Oliveira-Cruz
- R. Tang
- Lindsay Nelson
- Ramón Rico
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- S. Restubog
- P. Bordia
- M. Bolino
- W. H. Turnley
- Sarbari Bordia
- R. Tang
- Carlos-María Alcover
- Ramón Rico
Citations in the corpus
- The Role of Ethical Values in an Expanded Psychological Contract (2009, background): “However, some researchers (for example Marks, 2001; McLean Parks et al., 1998) have argued that such an approach ignores specific empirical evidence that suggests psychological contracts can often encompass multiple relationships which operate not only within but also outside the organization as…”
- The role of Task-orienTed versus relaTionship- orienTed leadership on normaTive conTracT and group performance (2009, background): “More specifically, Marks (2001) claims that the concept of a psychological contract needs to be redefined, taking into consideration that it can establish differences between the different entities which operate at different organizational levels. Therefore, the number and type of psychological cont”
- Breach of Psychological Contract and the Development of Burnout and Engagement: A Longitudinal Study Among Soldiers on a Peacekeeping Mission (2010, background): “However, the individual develops a psychological contract specific to situations during his or her professional activity and believes that the relationship is regulated by a set of mutual obligations (Marks, 2001; Shore et al., 2004).”
- Understanding the changing nature of psychological contracts in 21st century organizations (2017, background): “Researchers in both the organizational behavior and social exchange literatures have recently recognized that employees simultaneously hold distinct perceptions about multiple-foci social exchange relationships, referring to several organizational agents, supervisors, and coworkers (Cropanzano & Rup”
- Breach Begets Breach: Trickle-Down Effects of Psychological Contract Breach on Customer Service (2010, background): “Future research should explore other foci in relation to psychological contracts, including coworkers and work teams (Marks, 2001).”
- Is coworker feedback more important than supervisor feedback for increasing innovative behavior? (2019, unknown): “with whom employees have contact, such as co-workers, can also affect employees’ psychological contract perceptions (Alcover et al., 2017; Marks, 2001).”
- Trust and the psychological contract (2007, background): “The psychological contract has achieved prominence as an investigative paradigm within organisational research ( Marks, 2001”