Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework.
By G. John Geldhof, Kristopher J Preacher, Michael Zyphur. Psychological methods, 2014
1,340 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/990e117c11e89affc1dcdad4867c417a5c49129e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Allison S. Gabriel
- M. Butts
- Kathrin Rosing
- John P Trougakos
- Michael S. Cole
- P. M. Bal
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Michael S. Cole
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Shannon G. Taylor
- P. M. Bal
- Kathrin Rosing
- A. Bedeian
- Reinhard Pekrun
In Statistics and Probability
- K. Horstmann
- P. M. Bal
- Michael Leatherbee
- Zhen Zhang
- Brent A. Scott
- Paul G. W. Jansen
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Matthias Ziegler
Citations in the corpus
- Experience Sampling Methods: A Discussion of Critical Trends and Considerations for Scholarly Advancement (2018, methodology): “Specifically, Geldhof et al. (2014) argued that “ignoring hierarchical [multi-level] data structures can bias estimates of inter-item relationships, likewise biasing reliability estimates for a desired level of analysis” (p. 72).”
- The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire: Validation for Pre-Adolescent Students (2015, methodology): “Reliability was analysed using Cronbach’s a, and composite reliability indices were computed following the approach of Geldhof, Preacher, and Zyphur (2014).”
- Developing and Testing a Dynamic Model of Workplace Incivility Change (2017, background): “Estimated within-level alpha was .77 and the between-level alpha was .95 (Geldhof et al., 2014).”
- Assessing Personality States: What to Consider when Constructing Personality State Measures (2020, background): “Geldhof et al. (2014) showed that omega is, under almost all circumstances, preferable to alpha in all cases for the estimation of within-level reliability.”
- Bouncing back from psychological contract breach: How commitment recovers over time (2016, methodology): “…within-person level (i.e., we look at factors that drive within-person fluctuations in commitment recovery), internal consistency reliability of the 3-item scale was tested at the within-person level using the multilevel confirmatory factor analysis approach of Geldhof, Preacher, and Zyphur (2014).”
- Strengths use and work engagement: a weekly diary study (2016, methodology): “The within-person reliability of the week-level variables was calculated using the multilevel approach as suggested by Geldhof, Preacher, and Zyphur (2014).”
- A Dynamic Model of Entrepreneurial Uncertainty and Business Opportunity Identification: Exploration as a Mediator and Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy as a Moderator (2017, methodology): “Cronbach’s a was computed based on the multilevel approach by Geldhof, Preacher, and Zyphur (2014).”
- A CLOSER LOOK AT GRIT AND LANGUAGE MINDSET AS PREDICTORS OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE ACHIEVEMENT (2020, methodology): “For all scales, we used Cronbach’s α to assess internal consistency and omega (ω) to assess composite reliability (Geldhof et al., 2014).”