When Competence Is Irrelevant: The Role of Interpersonal Affect in Task-Related Ties

By Tiziana Casciaro, Miguel Sousa Lobo. 2008

417 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8fb38b68949b52248c2132520ab79ea4f61a3eb7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Contaminating Effects of Building Instrumental Ties (2014, background): “Professional and personal networks can overlap significantly, with task goals and personal goals coexisting within the same social relationships (Casciaro and Lobo, 2008), but these two forms of tie content are conceptually distinct, and their active pursuit could have different effects on individua”
Building a Sustainable Model of Human Energy in Organizations: Exploring the Critical Role of Resources (2012, background): “They and Casciaro and Lobo (2008) showed that employees have a tendency to 32 † The Academy of Management Annals D ow nl oa de d by [ U ni ve rs ity o f M ic hi ga n] a t 1 1: 00 0 8 M ay 2 01 2 avoid people they perceive to be de-energizing, even at the expense of getting the help and information…”
The Bright Side of Being Prosocial at Work, and the Dark Side, Too: A Review and Agenda for Research on Other-Oriented Motives, Behavior, and Impact in Organizations (2016, background): “Finally, prosocial behaviors make competence less threatening to others; thus, when talented employees demonstrate concern for others, instead of being viewed as competitors, they become valued allies (Casciaro & Lobo, 2008; Kim & Glomb, 2010).”
Unlocking Founding Team Prior Shared Experience: A Transactive Memory System Perspective (2012, background): “However, recent studies have discovered that expertise awareness may be situated within the social exchange context such that knowing or not knowing is shaped by social relationships, particularly by trust among members (Casciaro and Lobo, 2008).”
The Space Between Us: A Social-Functional Emotions View of Ambivalent and Indifferent Workplace Relationships (2017, background): “…leader–member exchange (LMX) relationships, mutual developmental relationships, high-quality connections, strong ties, and communal relationships (Casciaro & Lobo, 2008; Dutton & Heaphy, 2003; Eby & Allen, 2012; Granovetter, 1973; Kram & Isabella, 1985; Methot, LePine, Podsakoff, & Christian,…”
Resources and Relationships in Entrepreneurship: An Exchange Theory of the Development and Effects of the Entrepreneur-Investor Relationship (2017, background): “Further, because affective and instrumental relational dimensions are often intertwined in theworkplace (e.g., Casciaro & Lobo, 2008; Joshi & Knight, 2015), it is important to explore how the interplay of affective and instrumental concerns influences the development of the entrepreneur-investor…”
Envy As Pain: Rethinking the Nature of Envy and Its Implications for Employees and Organizations (2012, background): “We believe that this is so because research shows that competence is less relevant when people are perceived as lacking warmth (Casciaro & Lobo, 2008).”
Trust as a predictor of innovation network ties in project teams (2015, background): “The collective work of Casciaro and Lobo (2005, 2008) showed how interpersonal affect (e.g. liking another) moderates the impact of competence on the formation of task-related ties.”
Network Churn: The Effects of Self-Monitoring Personality on Brokerage Dynamics (2010, background): “Our paper benefi ted enormously from feedback we received from our editor, Phil Anderson, and the three anonymous reviewers.”
Coactive Vicarious Learning: Toward a Relational Theory of Vicarious Learning in Organizations (2017, background): “This relational context captures the qualitative nature of a pair’s interactions, reflecting the positive or negative attributes of their relationship, such as its affective tone (Casciaro & Lobo, 2008), level of trust (Levin & Cross, 2004) and “smoothness” of communication (Lipshitz et al., 2007).”