The Space Between Us: A Social-Functional Emotions View of Ambivalent and Indifferent Workplace Relationships

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Office Chit-Chat as a Social Ritual: The Uplifting Yet Distracting Effects of Daily Small Talk at Work (2020, background): “With respect to OCB, positive social emotions are a key ingredient in the successful maintenance of relationships; they “ draw others closer ” (Methot et al., 2017: 1795) by signaling cooperative and prosocial intentions (Rothman & Magee, 2016).”
Affect and leader-member exchange in the new millennium: A state-of-art review and guiding framework (2017, background): “Another study (Methot et al., 2017) looked at the disability status of the follower and how this generates ambivalent LMX relationships via mixed emotions.”
Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Ambivalence and Task Performance: The Cross-Domain Buffering Role of Social Support (2019, background): “Ambivalence researchers have highlighted that a critical step for future research is the investigation of the effects of ambivalence on employee behavior (Ashforth et al., 2014; Methot et al., 2017).”