The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices

By Michael J. Mol, Julian Birkinshaw. 2009

735 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80abfb43248f6b58d747335c6977e33eef676546

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

How does perceived firm innovativeness affect the consumer (2011, background): “For example, senior management can make it a priority to put into place management processes, marketing plans and human resources programs focused on corporate creativity and novel solutions that have the potential to be market changing (Mol & Birkinshaw, 2009; Simpson, Siguaw, & Enz, 2006).”
Working Paper (2015, background): “See, for instance, Audretsch and Feldman (1996); McEvily and Zaheer (1999); Mol and Birkinshaw (2009) and Fu (2012).”
Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance (2014, background): “The theoretical framework provided by the resource-based view (RBV) facilitates clear analysis of innovation and its association with performance (Damanpour et al., 2009; Galende & de la Fuente, 2003; Mol & Birkinshaw, 2009; Yang, Marlow, & Lu, 2009).”
How a Firm's Competitive Environment and Digital Strategic Posture Influence Digital Business Strategy (2013, background): “Under conditions of complexity and uncertainty, managers look to industry peers for frames of reference in determining firm strategy (Feigenbaum and Thomas 1994; Mol and Birkinshaw 2009).”
Management innovation and firm performance: An integration of research findings (2015, background): “…N P β, r China 189 MI,TI O OC M P E-N P β, r Montes et al. (2005) 202 MI, TI O EU MS P E P β Mazzanti et al. (2006) 71 MI O EU M P E P β Mazzanti and Zoboli (2008) 140 MI,TI O EU M P E P r Mol and Birkinshaw (2009) 1,048 MI,TI O EU MS P E O β Mothe and Thi (2010) 555 MI O EU MS P E P β, r…”
Board composition and forms of innovation: does diversity make a difference? (2012, background): “Fifth, as past research has found that firms open to external ideas were more likely to innovate and this openness variable also appears to explain management innovation, we have included a measure of openness (Laursen and Salter, 2006; Mol and Birkinshaw, 2009).”
Effects of organizational innovation and technological innovation capabilities on firm performance: evidence from firms in China’s Pearl River Delta (2019, background): “First, our research thus provides certain insights to resolve the very minimal empirical evidence of the effect of OI and technological innovation on firm performance (Mol and Birkinshaw 2009), especially in emerging China contexts.”
The mediator role of learning capability and business innovativeness between total quality management and financial performance (2014, background): “Furthermore, substantial evidence in the literature indicates that business innovativeness facilitates the capitalisation of innovations through lowered production costs, reductions in delivery time and increased operational flexibility (Mol and Birkinshaw 2009).”
The Conjoint Influence of Top and Middle Management Characteristics on Management Innovation (2018, background): “Our interpretation of our dependent variable is akin to that of Mol and Birkinshaw (2009) and Vaccaro et al. (2012), with higher scores indicating a greater extent of organization-wide changes in managerial structures, processes, and practices.”
Returns to alliance portfolio diversity : The relative effects of partner diversity on firm’s innovative performance and productivity (2014, methodology): “This measure is widely used in prior research (e.g., Chowdhury & Lang, 1996; Mol & Birkinshaw, 2009) and captures improvements in efficiency either by increasing turnover with the same workforce or realizing the same amount of sales with a smaller workforce.”