Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance

By César Camisón, A. Villar-López. 2014

1,096 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21c9030d177151ff5b3708f26c9ae394d16d6780

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Innovation and business performance for Spanish SMEs: New evidence from a multi-dimensional approach (2018, background): “They are more closely related to management, rather than to the firm’s, main activities (Camisón and Villar-López, 2014; Walker et al., 2015).”
Organizational innovation, technological innovation, and export performance: The effects of innovation radicalness and extensiveness (2017, background): “” However, the relationships among different types of innovation have rarely been investigated (Camisón and Villar-López, 2014; Damanpour and Aravind, 2011; Gunday, Ulusoy, Kilic, & Alpkan, 2011; Sanidas, 2005).”
A Review of Dynamic Capabilities, Innovation Capabilities, Entrepreneurial Capabilities and Their Consequences (2020, background): “Product innovation capability allows firms to effectively change their resources into innovative offerings that are unique and are better in terms of quality to exceed customers’ expectations (Camison & Villar-Lopez, 2014).”
Effects of organizational innovation and technological innovation capabilities on firm performance: evidence from firms in China’s Pearl River Delta (2019, methodology): “Innovation scholars have long argued that for firms to achieve their competitive advantage, executives must be engaged in OI (Damanpour and Evan 1984; Danmanpour 1991; Camisón and Villar-López 2014; Yamin et al. 1997).”
Determinants of innovativeness in SMEs: disentangling core innovation and technology adoption capabilities (2017, background): “…innovation can be autonomous, it can promote learning and communication in the business, it can be a factor supporting innovation in products and processes, or it can be a necessary response to technological change (Camisón and Villar-López, 2014; Damanpour et al., 1989; Mothe et al., 2015).”
Innovation as a driver of eco‐innovation in the firm: An approach from the dynamic capabilities theory (2020, neutral): “This complementary effect derives from sharing competencies, resources, and routines in the process of innovation, due to the generation of economies of scale and learning (Camisón and Villar-López, 2014).”