A Great Many Things to Do and Not a Minute to Spare: Can Feedback From Supervisors Moderate the Relationship Between Skill Variety, Time Pressure, and Employees' Innovative Behavior?
By Katrin Noefer, Ralf Stegmaier, Beate Molter, Karlheinz Sonntag. 2009
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78508d863d883fe6578fb9b6aaf061791d1c9efe
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Marieke Thurlings
- M. Janssen
- A. Bos‐Nehles
- Jinghuan Zhang
- A. Evers
- Feifei Ren
- Marjan Vermeulen
- M. Renkema
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- A. Bos‐Nehles
- Marieke Thurlings
- M. Janssen
- Jinghuan Zhang
- A. Evers
- Feifei Ren
- Marjan Vermeulen
- M. Renkema
In Social Psychology
- Marieke Thurlings
- M. Janssen
- A. Bos‐Nehles
- Jinghuan Zhang
- A. Evers
- Feifei Ren
- Marjan Vermeulen
- M. Renkema
Citations in the corpus
- Job Stressors, Organizational Innovation Climate, and Employees’ Innovative Behavior (2015, background): “For example, researchers were puzzled by the findings that time pressure was found positively related to idea generation (Noefer et al., 2009), yet job insecurity had adverse effect on creativity (Probst et al.”
- HRM and innovative work behaviour: a systematic literature review (2017, methodology): “However, some scholars, such as Noefer et al. (2009), treated IWB as a two-dimensional construct and found that HRM practices had different effects on idea generation and on idea implementation.”
- Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature (2016, unknown): “…Mueller and Kamdar (2011) Non-self 291 .91 .35/.87 Mueller, Melwani, and Goncalo (2012) Non-self 140 .78 .20/– Ng and Feldman (2009) Non-self 162 .93 .08/– Noefer et al. (2009) Self 81 .93 .26/.53 Ohly, Sonnentag, and Pluntke (2006) Non-self 278 .92 .31/.65 .12/.91 Oldham and Cummings (1996) Self…”
- Toward a Model of Explaining Teachers’ Innovative Behavior (2015, background): “For example, Noefer et al. (2009) did not distinguish the second stage of idea promotion.”