Toward a Model of Explaining Teachers’ Innovative Behavior

By Marieke Thurlings, A. Evers, Marjan Vermeulen. 2015

461 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c1f5d0575796eef9c6339b3adb060d13c3f486c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Rob L. Martens
2. A. Evers
3. Zhenhong Wang
4. Ya Liu
5. Mingjun Li
6. Luyi Liu
7. Jiwon Park
8. Marjan Vermeulen

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Jiwon Park
2. Andrea Klaeijsen
3. Rob L. Martens
4. A. Evers
5. Zhenhong Wang
6. Ya Liu
7. Mingjun Li
8. Luyi Liu

In Social Psychology

1. Karel Kreijns
2. Jiwon Park
3. Ya Liu
4. Andrea Klaeijsen
5. Rob L. Martens
6. A. Evers
7. Zhenhong Wang
8. Mingjun Li

Citations in the corpus

• Proactive Personality and Innovative Work Behavior: the Mediating Effects of Affective States and Creative Self-Efficacy in Teachers (2016, background): “While it is clear that proactive personality is positively associated with the IWB of employees in companies, few studies have examined this relationship in school teachers, who are engaged in work that is directly associated with children development (Thurlings et al. 2015).”
• Teachers’ Innovative Behaviour: The Importance of Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction, Intrinsic Motivation, and Occupational Self-Efficacy (2018, background): “Nevertheless, motivation and self-efficacy appear to influence teachers’ innovative behaviour (Thurlings et al., 2015) and the extent to which teachers introduce new ideas in their schools (Pyhältö et al.”
• The role of basic psychological needs satisfaction in the relationship between transformational leadership and innovative work behavior (2021, background): “Furthermore, regarding research on IWB in schools, too little attention was paid to the investigation of intervening mechanisms such as BPNS (Thurlings et al., 2015).”
• Examining Structural Relationships between Work Engagement, Organizational Procedural Justice, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovative Work Behavior for Sustainable Organizations (2017, background): “Janssen also described innovative work behavior as being comprised of three different behavioral tasks: idea generation, idea promotion, and idea realization [5,26].”
• Teacher quality and school improvement: what is the role of research? (2015, unknown): “While reporting scholarship referring to both strategies, this article focuses on teacher behaviour and on bottom-up and inside-out measures of improvement, in line with my research question and with recent research reviews (Thurlings, Evers, & Vermeulen, 2014).”
• Transformational leadership, leader–member exchange and school learning climate: Impact on teachers’ innovative behaviour in the Netherlands (2020, background): “This definition by De Jong and Den Hartog (2007) is most often used in recent educational research (Thurlings et al., 2015).”