Leader–member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement
By Judith Volmer, Daniel Spurk, Cornelia Niessen. 2012
413 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/74bca11226f8a009177934c176cd5c73d2ca73f3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Geert van Hootegem
- Barbara Grah
- S. Spiegelaere
- Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben
- O. Epitropaki
- R. Kark
- Matej Cerne
- Mateja Grošelj
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- R. Kark
- O. Epitropaki
- C. Mainemelis
- Geert van Hootegem
- Barbara Grah
- S. Spiegelaere
- Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben
- Matej Cerne
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- R. Kark
- O. Epitropaki
- C. Mainemelis
- Marilyn V. Whitman
- M. Chambel
- Sandra Penger
- Geert van Hootegem
- Barbara Grah
Citations in the corpus
- Authentic and transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: the moderating role of psychological empowerment (2020, background): “As followers havemore freedom and are able tomake their own decisions, they show a higher level of commitment in the creative process (Volmer et al., 2012).”
- Creative Leadership: A Multi-Context Conceptualization† (2015, background): “Volmer et al. (2012) in a longitudinal field survey integrated job design theory and LMX theory and found support for an interactive effect of LMX and job autonomy on creative work involvement, which has generally been defined as “the extent to which an employee engages his or her time and effort…”
- Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature (2016, neutral): “….51/.86 Van Dyne, Jehn, and Cummings (2002) Non-self 195 .88 .37/.90 Venkataramani, Richter, and Clarke (2014) Non-self 214 .80 .29/.88 .21/.76 .04/.91 Volmer et al. (2012) Self 144 .89 .33/.76 .17/.86 Wang (2009) Non-self 259 .77 .47/.72 .02/.80 .01/.74 Wang and Peng (2013) Self 323 .73 .60/.85…”