What does team–member exchange bring to the party? A meta‐analytic review of team and leader social exchange

By G. Banks, John H. Batchelor, A. Seers, Ernest H. O’Boyle, J. Pollack, K. Gower. 2014

263 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7253454d31e983929e683e2eb9150cc810cedce7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Shanshan Qian
2. Chao Miao
3. R. Humphrey

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Shanshan Qian
2. Chao Miao
3. R. Humphrey
4. Neal M. Ashkanasy
5. Ashlea Troth
6. Herman H. M. Tse
7. Amy L Collins
8. P. Riley

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Shanshan Qian
2. Chao Miao
3. R. Humphrey
4. Neal M. Ashkanasy
5. A. Maxwell
6. P. Riley

Citations in the corpus

• Are the emotionally intelligent good citizens or counterproductive? A meta-analysis of emotional intelligence and its relationships with organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. (2017, methodology): “We argued that popularly used and more established scales may produce different effect sizes relative to newer and less established ones (Banks et al., 2014).”
• A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for redundancy (2016, unknown): “The use of relative weights in meta-analyses has gained great popularity and acceptance in the management literature (Banks et al., 2014; Behson, 2012; Chiaburu, Munoz & Gardner, 2013; Chiaburu, Peng, Oh, Banks & Lomeli, 2013; Derue, Nahrgang, Wellman, & Humphrey, 2011; O'Boyle, Humphrey, Pollack,…”