Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An Updated Model and Meta-Analysis

806 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Socialization tactics and newcomer adjustment: A meta-analytic review and test of a model (2007, background): “First, similar to Hausknecht, Day, and Thomas (2004), we report both ks and kc. ks corresponds to the number of separate samples that were used in calculating a population estimate.”
Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Techniques in Greece: The Role of Core Self-Evaluations (2007, background): “In their meta-analysis, Hausknecht et al. (2004) revealed that interviews, work sample tests, résumés, and references were perceived relatively favourably.”
Reasons for Being Selective When Choosing Personnel Selection Procedures (2010, positive): “These were chosen (a) due to the variance in predictive validity (see, e.g., Schmidt & Hunter, 1998) and applicants’ reactions to the procedures (Hausknecht et al., 2004) and (b) because of the expectation (based on studies such as Schuler et al., 1993) that certain procedures will be used by at…”
Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Methods: An International Comparison between the Netherlands, the United States, France, Spain, Portugal, and Singapore (2008, neutral): “These lines of research appear to offer particularly fruitful avenues of enquiry as applicant reaction research develops into a fully-fledged sub-domain for research within personnel psychology internationally (see, for instance, Hausknecht et al., 2004 ).”