Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Techniques in Greece: The Role of Core Self-Evaluations

By Ioannis E. Nikolaou, T. Judge. 2007

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/517dd34fec6607077ffd042aec09c43571711e81

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Ute R. Hülsheger
2. T. Judge
3. Jesús Salgado
4. Neil Anderson
5. Neal Schmitt
6. N. Guenole
7. F. Landy

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Ute R. Hülsheger
2. Jesús Salgado
3. Neil Anderson
4. Günter W. Maier
5. P. Muck
6. Thorsten Stumpp
7. T. Judge
8. Neal Schmitt

Citations in the corpus

• Core Self-Evaluations in Germany: Validation of a German Measure and its Relationships with Career Success (2010, methodology): “Used in subsequent research (e.g. Beal, Trougakos, Weiss, & Green, 2006; Laschinger, Purdy, & Almost, 2007; Nikolaou & Judge, 2007; Wanberg et al., 2005), the scale’s properties have continued to be supported.”
• Applicant Reactions in Selection: Comprehensive Meta-Analysis into Reaction Generalization Versus Situational Specificity (2010, background): “The final database included one or more independent samples from 17 countries: Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Morocco, the Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Turkey, and the United States.”
• Reasons for Being Selective When Choosing Personnel Selection Procedures (2010, unknown): “The rise of research into applicant reactions worldwide (e.g., Anderson & Witvliet, 2008; Bertolino & Steiner, 2007; Hausknecht, Day, & Thomas, 2004; Nikolaou & Judge, 2007) shows that the importance of applicant reactions has been increasingly recognized in the academic literature.”