Prevalence and forms of bullying among business professionals: A comparison of two different strategies for measuring bullying

By Denise Salin. 2001

518 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/69ced0f6d687474998cff486023f12c069d7af1c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Strategic bullying as a supplementary, balanced perspective on destructive leadership (2007, background): “Building upon recent work by Salin [Salin, D. (2003). Bullying and organizational politics in”
A job characteristics approach to explain workplace bullying (2010, methodology): “The NAQ is probably the most widely used instrument to measure workplace bullying (Mikkelsen & Einarsen, 2001 ; Notelaers, Einarsen, De Witte, & Vermunt, 2006 ; Salin, 2001 ).”
Managers in the firing line: Contributing factors to workplace bullying by staff – an interview study (2007, background): “Moreover, Salin (2001) suggests that research into “how superiors can be put into a position in which they cannot defend themselves and how bullying alters power relations” (Salin 2001: 435) is required.”
Nightmares, Demons, and Slaves (2006, result): “The overall sample is similar to other studies examining bullying in professional worker cohorts (D. Lewis, 1999; Salin, 2001), and sex, ethnicity, and age were similar across the focus groups and interviews.”
Cyberbullying definition and measurement: Some critical considerations (2009, unknown): “single behavior) (Salin, 2001).”
Gender minority as a risk factor of exposure to bullying at work: The case of male assistant nurses (2004, methodology): “…exposure to bullying by such a single item following a presented definition of bullying has been done in many studies (e.g., Einarsen & Skogstad, 1996), and has been claimed to be the most valid method for measuring perceived exposure to bullying at work (Mikkelsen & Einarsen, 2001; Salin, 2001).”
Perceived severity of various bullying behaviours at work and the relevance of exposure to bullying (2009, result): “In the present study, the number of witnesses of bullying was considerably higher than the figures reported by other researchers (Salin, 2001), which could be due to a greater public awareness of the phenomenon in recent years, resulting in workers being more likely to recognize bullying.”
Burned by Bullying in the American Workplace: Prevalence, Perception, Degree and Impact† (2007, unknown): “The NAQ was selected for its established reliability and comparison potential due to its use in a number of previous bullying studies (Einarsen and Hoel, 2001; Hoel and Cooper, 2000; Hoel et al., 2001; Mikkelsen and © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2007 Einarsen, 2001; Salin, 2001).”
Self and peer nominations of bullying: An analysis of incident rates, individual differences, and perceptions of the working environment (2003, methodology): “Further, research evidence of the negative consequences of bullying (Björkqvist, Österman, & Hjelt-Bäck, 1994; Edelmann & Woodall, 1997; Leymann & Gustafsson, 1996; Niedl, 1996) has also led to a growing awareness of the need to undertake investigation of this particular problem (Salin, 2001).”
Workplace bullying: The role of psychosocial work environment factors. (2009, background): “, Di Martino, 2002; Northern Territory Government, 2005) and international studies (e.g., Einarsen & Skogstad, 1996; Hoel et al., 2001; Salin, 2001).”
Ways of Explaining Workplace Bullying: A Review of Enabling, Motivating and Precipitating Structures and Processes in the Work Environment (2003, methodology): “…by researchers in the UK and Ireland (Hoel & Cooper, 2000; O’Moore, 2000; Rayner, 1997), Australia (McCarthy, 1996; Sheehan, 1996) and Northern Europe (Einarsen, 1996; Salin, 2001; Vartia, 1996), whereas German researchers (Zapf et al., 1996) have used the term ‘mobbing’ for the same phenomenon.”
Perceptions of and reactions to workplace bullying: A social exchange perspective (2010, background): “Empirical studies clearly show that only a minority of those subjected to pre-determined ‘bullying behaviours’ self-label as bullied (Salin, 2001).”
Workplace bullying: a systematic review of risk factors and outcomes (2006, background): “Sheehan (1999) explained that companies and organizations, facing a constant changing market, are required to make continuous changes in order to enhance their competitiveness.”