Self and peer nominations of bullying: An analysis of incident rates, individual differences, and perceptions of the working environment

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Workplace victimization: aggression from the target's perspective. (2009, background): “Stressful and competitive work environments have been associated with higher levels of victimization (Coyne et al. 2003, Vartia 1996), as has role conflict (Einarsen et al. 1994, Skogstad et al. 2007a), role ambiguity (Agervold & Mikkelsen 2004, Jennifer et al. 2003, Quine 2001), the number of…”
The ill-treatment of employees with disabilities in British workplaces (2013, background): “Coyne et al. (2003) suggest that, after being bullied, victims may perceive the workplace more negatively, and their perception of a conflictridden and hostile workplace then affects their health.”
Individual and situational predictors of workplace bullying: Why do perpetrators engage in the bullying of others? (2009, methodology): “7% when applying a more stringent criterion reflecting both self- and peer-reported behaviour (Coyne, Chong, Seigne, & Randall, 2003 ).”
Workplace bullying: a cross‐level assessment (2006, background): “A predisposition to negativity lends itself to a victim’s perception and belief that once bullied they will always be bullied (Coyne et al., 2003; Jockin et al., 2001).”
A Bully as an Archetypal Destructive Leader (2007, background): “The bully therefore becomes the model of interaction with others, due to the lack of sanctions against the bullying activities observed by others in the organization (Coyne et al., 2003).”