Cyberbullying definition and measurement: Some critical considerations

By Ersilia Menesini, Annalaura Nocentini. 2009

274 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d584b572fe462ff220bad1a99b968dc171a2ccc9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Integrating Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying: Challenges of Definition and Measurement in Adolescents – a Review (2015, background): “or even a higher rank position of the bully in a virtual community (Menesini and Nocentini 2009).”
Bullying in schools: the state of knowledge and effective interventions (2017, background): “Such inconsistencies have strongly influenced rate estimation, and scholars have called for greater consensus in definition and measurement (Menesini & Nocentini, 2009).”
Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. (2014, background): “Other researchers have noted that a single-item measure is sufficient in research domains that have a single referent that is easy to recognize and understand (Menesini & Nocentini, 2009).”
Detection of Cyberbullying Incidents on the Instagram Social Network (2015, background): “Although cyberbullying may not cause any physical damage initially, it has potentially devastating psychological effects like depression, low self-esteem, suicide ideation, and even suicide (Hinduja and Patchin 2010; E. Menesini 2009).”
School Bullying and Cyberbullying Among Boys and Girls: Roles and Overlap (2017, background): “Smith and Slonje (2010) and Menesini and Nocentini (2009), on the other hand, argued that the repetition criteria does not apply for cyberbullying.”
Cyberbullying: Labels, Behaviours and Definition in Three European Countries (2010, background): “Definitions 139 ▲ proposed by the literature for power imbalance in the cyber context (Hinduja & Patchin, 2007; Menesini & Nocentini, 2009a) were not supported by our results.”
Cyber-Aggression: Definition and Concept of Cyberbullying (2010, background): “Some researchers have suggested that there is a need to address the definition issues within the area of aggression and bullying via communication devices (Coyne, Chesney, Logan, & Madden, 2009; Menesini & Nocentini, 2009).”
Structural validation and cross-cultural robustness of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire (2015, background): “Concerning the imbalance of power, high levels of technological knowledge and the difﬁculties that the victims may have in identifying the aggressors, can be interpreted as inferiority before the aggressor (Menesini & Nocentini, 2009; Vandebosch & Van Cleemput, 2008).”
From cyberbullying to electronic aggression: typology of the phenomenon (2012, background): “These three features are generally accepted, although discussed critically in the literature in terms of the new features that occur with cyberaggression (Dooley, Pyzalski, and Cross 2009 ; Menesini and Nocentini 2009 ; Nocentini et al.”