Leadership self‐efficacy and managers' motivation for leading change

By Laura L. Paglis, Stephen G. Green. 2002

469 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6935d0f4bc12ee6e5a21a059b013077eb68be9f7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Cultivating Principals’ Self-Efficacy: Supports that Matter (2007, background): “Leadership self-efficacy has been related to performance evaluations in leadership simulations and in ratings by peers and superiors in actual work settings (Chemers et al., 2000; Paglis & Green, 2002).”
Attitudes towards Inclusion and Self-Efficacy of Principals and Teachers. (2014, background): “This positive influence becomes particularly important when difficulties arise through the course of process change (Paglis & Green, 2002).”
Psychological Predictors of College Women's Leadership Aspirations (2003, background): “…(Dicesare, 2001) and from findings that leaders with high self-esteem were more likely to perceive themselves as possessing leadership skills (Paglis & Green, 2002), we hypothesized that self-esteem and leadership aspirations would be positively related and that self-esteem would account for…”
Principals Sense of Efficacy: Assessing a Promising Construct. (2004, background): “Leadership self-efficacy has been related to direction setting and to gaining followers’ commitment, as well as in overcoming obstacles to change (Paglis and Green, 2002).”
Leaders’ Impact on Organizational Change: Bridging Theoretical and Methodological Chasms (2019, background): “In one study, leaders’ self-esteem was linked with followers’ reports of their leaders’ change-promoting behaviors, as assessed through questions about the degree towhich the leader “push[es] change within the unit” and “quickly chang[es] work processes that are not effective (Paglis & Green, 2002).”
Career commitment and career success: moderating role of self‐efficacy (2009, background): “Leadership self-efficacy was found to be related to direction setting and to gaining followers' commitment ( Paglis and Green, 2002”
Leadership self‐efficacy: research findings and practical applications (2010, background): “They developed an LSE scale around the leader behaviors of setting a direction for the work unit, gaining followers' commitment to change goals, and overcoming obstacles to change ( Paglis and Green, 2002”
Leadership efficacy: Review and future directions (2008, background): “Examples from Table include ratings of leader potential (Chan & Drasgow, 200 ), attempts to take the lead (McCormick et al., 2002; Paglis and Green, 2002), motivation to lead (Chan & Drasgow, 200 ), organizational commitment (Paglis & Green, 2002), performance ratings from both peers and superiors (”
Leader Self and Means Efficacy: A multi-component approach (2012, methodology): “For Sample 3 (N = 219), the AVE for LSME was .48 exceeding the square of the correlation between LMSE and self-esteem, LMSE and LSE (Paglis & Green, 2002), and LSME and general self-efficacy.”
Why Some Teachers Resist Change and What Principals Can Do About It (2006, background): “Teachers who possess high selfefficacy also motivate and challenge themselves and guide their actions by visualizing success (Bandura, 1997; Paglis & Green, 2002).”
The Efficacy of Executive Coaching in Times of Organisational Change (2014, unknown): “Cronbach’s alpha for this study was .89.”