How Self-Regulation Creates Distinct Values: The Case of Promotion and Prevention Decision Making
By E. Tory Higgins. 2002
585 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/66bf282a281d2b87ca5c02cba4e4159eb54e4ea2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Angela Y. Lee
- E. Tory Higgins
- T. Avnet
- Joseph Cesario
- Abigail A. Scholer
- Utpal M. Dholakia
- Robert A. Baron
- P. Bryant
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- K. White
- Darren W. Dahl
- Utpal M. Dholakia
- P. Bryant
- Bas Verplanken
- Ayana Sato
- Joseph Cesario
- Jennifer L. Aaker
In General Decision Sciences
- E. Tory Higgins
- Angela Y. Lee
- T. Avnet
- Joseph Cesario
- Abigail A. Scholer
- Francis J. Flynn
- Lily Benjamin
- Jennifer L. Aaker
Citations in the corpus
- Goal Fulfillment and Goal Targets in Sequential Choice (2005, unknown): “More recently, Higgins and his colleagues have proposed the notion of regulatory focus that might shed light on shifts in preferences following positive or negative outcomes (Higgins 1998, 2002).”
- The Role of Anticipated Emotions in the Endowment Effect (2005, result): “Some support for our hypothesis was obtained by Liberman and her colleagues (Liberman, Idson, Camacho, & Higgins, 1999; see also Higgins, 2002), who manipulated regulatory focus and measured willingness to trade.”
- Walking with the scarecrow: The information-processing approach to decision research. (2008, background): “Voluntary attention describes devoting attention to information that individuals perceive is relevant to current goals, e.g., prevention of harm (Higgins, 2002).”
- Self‐regulation and decision heuristics in entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation and exploitation (2007, background): “Various studies show the significance of regulatory focus for decision-making (Higgins, 2002; Liberman et al., 2005; Zhou and Pham, 2004).”
- The Role of Regulatory Focus in the Experience and Self-Control of Desire for Temptations (2006, background): “This difference is evident in greater persistence in goal pursuit by promotion focused individuals (Roney, Higgins, & Shah, 1995), greater ability to bounce back and perform after a failure experience rather than quitting (Crowe & Higgins, 1997), greater capacity to change plans and use alternative ”
- How Regulatory Fit Affects Value in Consumer Choices and Opinions (2006, unknown): “Aaker and Lee (2001) find that people are more persuaded by prevention-framed messages or promotion-framed messages, depending on which features are more relevant to their momentary prevention or promotion orientation (see also Safer 1998, as described in Higgins 2002).”
- Leadership style and regulatory mode: Value from fit? (2006, background): “Based on regulatory Wt theory ( Higgins, 2000, 2002 ), we hypothesize that transformational leadership will be more eVective in increasing motivation and eliciting positive evaluations from people with more of a locomotion mode (those who focus on movement from one state to another) rather than peop”
- The value of distrust (2008, background): “In particular, it has been shown that the prevalence of a negativity bias is influenced by the nature of the judgment (Skowronski & Carlston, 1989), the motivational state of the individual (Higgins, 2002), and the object being evaluated (Ganzach & Czaczkes, 1995; Moon & Conlon, 2002).”
- Shopping Orientation and Mindsets: How Motivation Influences Consumer Information Processing During Shopping (2013, background): “Finally, demonstrating such a mindset fit contributes to the literature on regulatory fit: Higgins et al. (2003) speculated about fit effects between motivational orientations and mindsets, but this type of fit effect has never been tested.”
- An Assessment of Chronic Regulatory Focus Measures (2010, background): “Furthermore, Higgins (2002) posits that promotion and prevention concerns are not the endpoints of a unidimensional, bipolar construct; rather, the promotion or prevention system may be chronically more accessible than the other system for a person, but both systems also coexist independently.”
- To Be or Not Be? The Influence of Dissociative Reference Groups on Consumer Preferences (2006, background): “…groups may be more effective than other types of reference groups in influencing prevention-focused behaviors (i.e., those that focus on the avoidance of negative outcomes; Higgins, 2002), because dissociative reference groups involve a desire to avoid being associated with an undesired group.”