Walking with the scarecrow: The information-processing approach to decision research.

By John W. Payne, James R. Bettman. 2008

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4726d1c8699cff0c1b757ac884b345f370ee58d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Wendy Liu
2. F. Del Missier
3. W. Bruine de Bruin
4. Timo Mäntylä

In General Decision Sciences

1. Timo Mäntylä
2. F. Del Missier
3. W. Bruine de Bruin
4. Wendy Liu
5. Baruch Fischhoff
6. Nidhi Agrawal
7. E. Wan

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Wendy Liu
2. F. Del Missier
3. W. Bruine de Bruin
4. Timo Mäntylä

Citations in the corpus

• Executive functions in decision making: An individual differences approach (2010, background): “The capacity to effectively apply decision rules is essential in multiattribute choice contexts (Bettman, Luce, & Payne, 1998; Payne & Bettman, 2004).”
• Decision-making Competence, Executive Functioning, and General Cognitive Abilities (2012, background): “The capacity to apply decision rules is essential in multiattribute choice contexts presenting Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. multiple alternatives that vary along multiple dimensions (Bettman, Luce, & Payne, 1998; Payne & Bettman, 2004).”
• Focusing on Desirability: The Effect of Decision Interruption and Suspension on Preferences (2008, background): “A related distinction exists in research on attention, contrasting involuntary and voluntary attention (Kahneman 1973; Payne and Bettman 2004).”