Measuring Counterproductivity: Development and Initial Validation of a German Self-Report Questionnaire
By Bernd Marcus, H. Schuler, P. Quell, Gerhardt Humpfner. 2002
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ad90157662b2970e7ac9485268e6376e6751fd6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- M. Ashton
- Kibeom Lee
- Bernd Marcus
- James Friedrich
- Gale M. Lucas
- Dieter Zapf
- Vincent Rousseau
- Estelle M. Morin
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- M. Ashton
- Kibeom Lee
- Caroline Aubé
- Vincent Rousseau
- Conny Welk
- John P. Campbell
- Bernd Marcus
- Johannes Hartig
In Sociology and Political Science
- Kibeom Lee
- M. Ashton
- Bernd Marcus
- M. Bechtoldt
- Conny Welk
- John P. Campbell
- James Friedrich
- Johannes Hartig
Citations in the corpus
- Christian Religiosity, Self-Control and Social Conformity (2006, unknown): “30) for other measures (Marcus 2004; Marcus et al. 2002).”
- Self-Control in the General Theory of Crime: (2004, background): “If correlated with deviant workplace behaviors as dependent variable, the RBS produced an effect size of r = .63, far beyond Pratt and Cullen’s upper bounds of the 95 percent confidence intervals for behavioral (.40) or attitudinal (.32) measures (Marcus et al., 2002).”
- The Structure of Counterproductive Work Behavior (2016, methodology): “…to test a general factor model with just two constituent facets as in Bennett and Robinson’s (2000) OD-ID distinction, because two indicators are insufficient to identify the structural part of that model in CFA (see Marcus et al., 2002, for a more detailed explanation in the present context).”
- An Empirical Examination of the Construct Validity of Two Alternative Self-Control Measures (2003, background): “Of course, a test of this and similar hypotheses would require the inclusion of appropriate dependent variables (for a study involving deviant behavior at work as a criterion, see Marcus et al., 2002).”
- PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS EXPLAINING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN INTEGRITY TESTS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR: BIG FIVE, OR ONE IN ADDITION? (2007, background): “…(IBES, Marcus, 2006a; parts of the empirical work on the IBES are published in the English language, see Marcus, 2003, 2006b; Marcus & Schuler, 2004; Marcus et al., 2002, 2006), an integrity inventory originally developed in German, which contains a 60-item overt and a 55-item personality-based…”
- Counterproductive Behaviors and Psychological Well-being: The Moderating Effect of Task Interdependence (2009, background): “In a teamwork setting, boastful behaviors can take different forms, such as minimizing the contributions of one’s coworkers, bragging in public about one’s achievements or unduly putting the blame on other people when mistakes occur (Marcus et al. 2002).”
- Main and moderating effects of self-control, organizational justice, and emotional labour on counterproductive behaviour at work (2007, background): “Whereas employers tend to be very interested in investigating the rate of CB in their companies, the recruitment of organizations for studies on CB is very difficult (see Marcus et al., 2002).”