Perceived Organizational Family Support: A Longitudinal and Multilevel Analysis *
By C. Thompson, Eileen White Jahn, R. Kopelman, David J. Prottas. 2004
165 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/583b07f3f86b2944b64e9c2d77455ec3cf2e9fdc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Flexible work arrangements, work engagement, turnover intentions and psychological health (2015, background): “However, the current study suggests that employees may not consider that FWAs are real options, due to informal processes within organisations that do not support their use (Kirby and Krone 2002; Thompson et al. 2004).”
- Eldercare demands, strain, and work engagement: The moderating role of perceived organizational support (2011, background): “An important way to motivate employed caregivers to take advantage of such programs may be to offer these programs in the context of a broad variety of family-friendly services for all employees (Kopelman et al., 2006; Thompson et al., 2004; Wallen, 2002).”
- How Does Supervisory Family Support Influence Employees’ Attitudes and Behaviors? A Social Exchange Perspective (2014, result): “It is important to note that we do not dispute the importance of supervisory family support, as past research has suggested that such support is more important to employees’ well-being than are family-friendly benefits (Thompson et al., 2004).”