Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well.

By Herman Aguinis. 2011

564 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/503cb5011c92a7f9d8ec3ded12d97142c50a2602

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Dynamics of Lending-Based Prosocial Crowdfunding: Using a Social Responsibility Lens (2018, background): “approaches (Aguinis 2011; Carroll 1999; McWilliams and Siegel 2001; Waddock 2004; Waldman et al. 2006), each seeking to unveil particular mechanisms (Pasricha et al.”
Alignment Versus Monitoring: An Examination of the Effect of the CSR Committee and CSR-Linked Executive Compensation on CSR Performance (2021, background): “…environmental and social aspects, as in the following definition, where it is described as “context-specific organizational actions and policies that take into account stakeholders’ expectations and the triple bottom line of economic, social, and environmental performance” (Aguinis, 2011, p. 855).”
How Do Employees Perceive Corporate Responsibility? Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility Scale (2018, background): “Various definitions of the CSR construct have resulted in multiple measurement approaches (Aguinis, 2011; Morgeson et al., 2013).”
Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: The moderating role of CSR‐specific relative autonomy and individualism (2018, background): “Although typically a topic of study within strategic management, where organizational‐level social and financial performance are constructs of interest (Etzion, 2007; Lockett, Moon, & Visser, 2006; Wood, 2010), studies have begun to explore the psychology of CSR from the perspective of employees (Ag”
What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility (2012, background): “…investigating CSR at the individual level of analysis rely on yet a different set of theoretical frameworks such as organizational justice, social influence, needs, and self-determination theories (e.g., Aguinis, 2011; Rupp, 2011; Rupp et al., 2006; Rupp & Williams, 2011; Rupp et al., 2010).”
‘How corporate social responsibility can be integrated into corporate sustainability: a theoretical review of their relationships’ (2018, background): “In fact, the contemporary CSR takes into account the inclusion of the triple bottom line of economic, social, and environmental performance (Aguinis 2011; Aguinis and Glavas 2012).”
The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes (2014, background): “Therefore some scholars have called for an integrated view that includes both social and environmental dimensions (Aguinis, 2011; Elkington, 1997; Waddock, 2004)—which is a path we follow in this study.”
Employee-oriented HRM and voice behavior: a moderated mediation model of moral identity and trust in management (2018, background): “Research suggests that CSR management practices are imbued with ethical and moral issues (Aguinis, 2011).”
When corporate social responsibility motivates employee citizenship behavior: The sensitizing role of task significance (2018, background): “…organizational actions and policies that take into account stakeholders’ expectations and the triple bottom line of economic, social, and environmental performance” (Aguinis, 2011, p. 855), and as “the responsibility of enterprises for their impact on society” (European Commission, 2011, p. 6).”
Banks and environmental, social and governance drivers: Follow the market or the authorities? (2021, background): “The ESG can be considered as the evolution of the concept of CSR (Aguinis, 2011), since it specifies three core typologies of stakeholder-firm relationships: environmental, social and governance (Hassel & Semenova, 2013) and, in this sense, regarded as the modern “idea” of social responsibility (Bar”
Corporate social responsibility and bank financial performance in China: The moderating role of green credit (2021, unknown): “Aguinis(2011)views CSR as an expectation from stakeholders of the enterprises which accounts forthetriplebottomlineof economics,societyand environment.”
Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethical Leadership, and Trust Propensity: A Multi-Experience Model of Perceived Ethical Climate (2015, methodology): “CSR is the term used to capture an organization's intent, beyond the pursuit of profit, to effect positive community change through policies and actions directed toward people outside of the organization (see Aguinis 2010).”
Humane Entrepreneurship: How Focusing on People Can Drive a New Era of Wealth and Quality Job Creation in a Sustainable World (2018, background): “This paper takes in account the concept of Social Entrepreneurship, B-Crops, and Corporate Social Responsibility (Aguinis 2011).”
How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review (2017, background): “…CSR, which is de ﬁ ned for the purpose of this article as “ context-speci ﬁ c organizational actions and policies that take into account stakeholders ’ expectations and the triple bottom line of economic, social, and environmental performance ” (Aguinis, 2011; p. 855; cf. Aguinis & Glavas, 2012).”
THE BEST AND THE REST: REVISITING THE NORM OF NORMALITY OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE (2012, background): “If most of those rated are in the lowest category, then the rater, measurement instrument, or both are seen as biased (i.e., affected by severity bias; Cascio & Aguinis, 2011 chapter 5).”