Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground
By Sasha A. Barab, Kurt Squire. 2004
2,684 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Human Factors and Ergonomics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f0e6e7d48a2c4f0586b2d33cff7f3c3099a1cec
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Lisa C. Yamagata-Lynch
- Michael J. Hannafin
- Mingfong Jan
- Feng Wang
- Stephen Cooper
- Roy D. Pea
- Shuchi Grover
- Douglas H. Clements
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Michael J. Hannafin
- Susan McKenney
- Lisa C. Yamagata-Lynch
- Feng Wang
- Troy D. Sadler
- Mingfong Jan
- Stephen Cooper
- Sasha A. Barab
In Human Factors and Ergonomics
- Lisa C. Yamagata-Lynch
- D. Nussbaumer
- Michael J. Hannafin
- Mingfong Jan
- Feng Wang
- Stephen Cooper
- Roy D. Pea
- Shuchi Grover
Citations in the corpus
- Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle (2015, methodology): “Even more flexibility can be created by linking the framework with design-based research (Barab & Squire, 2004).”
- Instructional-Design Theories and Models: Building a Common Knowledge Base. Volume III. (2009, background): “• It uses multiple dependent variables (Barab & Squire, 2004; Collins et al., 2004).”
- Confronting Analytical Dilemmas for Understanding Complex Human Interactions in Design-Based Research From a Cultural—Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) Framework (2007, methodology): “…these studies often do not systematically address pressing school-wide issues in kindergarten through Grade 12 settings (Fishman, Marx, Blumenfeld, Krajcik, & Soloway, 2004) and do not adequately add value to theory development (Barab & Squire, 2004; Collins et al., 2004; diSessa & Cobb, 2004).”
- Comparative Understanding of School Subjects: Past, Present, and Future (2005, methodology): “…research approach we took is best described by the term design experiment (A. L. Brown, 1992; Collins, 1992).7 Since the meaning and practice of design experiments are currently unsettled (Barab & Squire, 2004; Kelly, 2003), we explain here how we interpreted and employed the idea in our project.”
- Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments (2005, methodology): “Theories generated from designs are often supported by examining learning in naturalistic contexts and through developing innovations, technological tools, and theories ( Barab & Squire, 2004 ).”
- MAHI: investigation of social scaffolding for reflective thinking in diabetes management (2008, neutral): “[3].”
- An introduction to educational design research (2013, background): “For example, the broad definition of Barab and Squire (2004) also encompasses most variations of educational design research: “a series of approaches, with the intent of producing new theories, artefacts, and practices that account for and potentially impact learning and teaching in naturalistic…”
- Learning is Not a Spectator Sport: Doing is Better than Watching for Learning from a MOOC (2015, neutral): “ACM 978-1-4503-3411-2/15/03. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724681 [8, 17], and classroom design research iterations [4, 19].”
- Cur r iculum Resear ch : Tow ar d a Fr amew or k for "Resear ch -based Cur r icula" (2007, background): “(This distinguishes this and all subsequent phases from traditional formative and summative evaluations, which do not necessarily connect to theory and do not typically create new theories, cf. Barab & Squire, 2004.)”
- Findings from a Pre-kindergarten Classroom: Making the Case for STEM in Early Childhood Education (2017, background): “DBR can be conceptualized as an iterative process of investigation, involving some sort of intervention and resulting in the production of theories and/or practices that have the potential to impact learning and teaching in the classroom (Barab & Squire, 2004).”