Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments

2,083 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Game-Based Learning in Science Education: A Review of Relevant Research (2013, methodology): “Design-based research has been suggested as a suitable methodology for those researchers who seek to improve their designs of technology-enhanced learning environments both theoretically and practically (Wang and Hannaﬁn 2005).”
Systematic Review of Design-Based Research Progress (2013, result): “…of assessing what the past decade of DBR has brought to the field of education and concur with most of the characteristics of DBR that they sketch, which align well with others cited in literature (Cobb, Confrey, diSessa, Lehrer, & Schauble, 2003; Reinking & Bradley, 2008; Wang & Hannafin, 2005).”
Instructional-Design Theories and Models: Building a Common Knowledge Base. Volume III. (2009, methodology): “Develop an initial research plan (Wang & Hannafin, 2005).”
The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition (SAMR) Model: a Critical Review and Suggestions for its Use (2016, background): “The instructional design process starts and ends with learning objectives and learning outcomes (Morrison et al. 2010; Wang and Hannafin 2005).”