The Effect of Stakeholder Preferences, Organizational Structure and Industry Type on Corporate Community Involvement

By Stephen Brammer, A. Millington. 2003

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/442508454e6222177534ed71b228a35f9769c053

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Sociology and Political Science

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment (2007, background): “Recent evidence suggests that employees and the public in general appear to attach significant and growing importance to the values of corporations and inter alia socially responsible behaviour by these organizations (Brammer and Millington, 2003).”
Beyond Philanthropy: Community Enterprise as a Basis for Corporate Citizenship (2005, unknown): “management functions (Brammer and Millington, 2003).”
Wisdom principles as a meta-theoretical basis for evaluating leadership (2009, background): “As well, organizations now contend legally and ethically with a widened range of stakeholders (Brammer & Millington, 2003; Donaldson & Preston, 1995; Ruf, Muralidhar, Brown, Janney, & Paul, 2001), and are no longer seen as isolated from the processes of social relations as social institutions…”
An Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility at Credit Line: A Narrative Approach (2008, methodology): “corporations tend to develop CSR policies using a stakeholder model (Brammer and Millington 2003) or through an analysis of their market/non-market position (Baron 1995), with the result that each individual company’s approach tends to be unique.”
The relevance of corporate social responsibility for a sustainable human resource management: An analysis of organizational attractiveness as a determinant in employees' selection of a (potential) employer (2012, background): “Because of its relevance for employees’ management (Brammer & Millington, 2003; Lockett et al., 2006; Brammer et al., 2007), Organizational Behavior and HRM researchers have investigated different aspects of CSR (Aguilera et al., 2007; Rupp et al., 2006).”
Too Little or Too Much? Untangling the Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Firm Financial Performance (2008, background): “Furthermore, top managers may promote the professional management of corporate philanthropic activities by creating a specialized department (Brammer and Millington 2003) and hiring professional managers (Saiia et al. 2003).”
Firm Philanthropy in Small- and Medium-Sized Family Firms (2014, unknown): “Studies focusing on corporate philanthropy in current management literature are scarce (Maas & Liket, 2011) and offer miscellaneous contributions to the field (Brammer & Millington, 2003).”
Corporate Innovation and Sustainable Community Development in Developing Countries (2012, background): “Brammer and Millington (2003) show that the chosen organizational form for managing CCI issues affects the nature of corporate social activities, and Idemudia (2009) concludes that the external management of CCI can have more positive impacts on community development than when managed internally.”
Modeling Corporate Citizenship, Organizational Trust, and Work Engagement Based on Attachment Theory (2010, background): “Research evidence shows that employees are highly concerned about the values of the firm and inter alia its socially responsible behavior beyond the requirement by law (Brammer and Millington, 2003).”
When CSR Is a Social Norm (2016, methodology): “We also controlled for two organizational-level variables, firm size (number of employees) and firm age (in years), which have been associated with organizational CSR activities (Brammer & Millington, 2003) and HRM practices (Datta, Guthrie, & Wright, 2005).”
Is Institutional Ownership Related to Corporate Social Responsibility? The Nonlinear Relation and Its Implication for Stock Return Volatility (2015, unknown): “These costs often include the diversion of valuable corporate resources such as cash, products, facilities, and human resources devoted to corporate charitable programs (Brammer and Millington 2003; McWilliams and Siegel 2001; Saiia et al. 2003).”