The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review

By Jean‐Pascal Gond, Assâad El akremi, V. Swaen, N. Babu. 2017

652 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d6448339e8e68c330438326934d2eab2197a14a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Critical Essay: The reconciliation of fraternal twins: Integrating the psychological and sociological approaches to ‘micro’ corporate social responsibility (2019, background): “Mainly informed by organizational behavior and industrial psychology, this stream of research focuses on the psychological mechanisms by which individuals perceive, evaluate, and react to CSR in and out of the workplace (e.g. Gond et al., 2017; Jones and Rupp, 2018; Rupp et al., 2006).”
Hypocritical organizations: Implications for employee social responsibility (2020, background): “This is especially so in the area of micro-level CSR, where longitudinal studies are rare, resulting in a limited narrative on the causality of relationships (Gond et al., 2017).”
Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethical Leadership: Investigating Their Interactive Effect on Employees’ Socially Responsible Behaviors (2017, background): “As pointed out by some authors, the use of time-lagged design is still very rare in the micro-CSR literature (De Roeck et al. 2016; Gond et al. 2017).”
The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Incumbent Employees: A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Mediating and Moderating Mechanisms (2020, methodology): “Although a variety of mediating factors have been proposed (Gond et al., 2017), most studies examine only one mediation mechanism through which perceived CSR affects employee outcomes.”
Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: The moderating role of CSR‐specific relative autonomy and individualism (2018, background): “Gond et al. (2017) highlighted the importance of understanding the motives that lead individuals (e.g., executives, managers, and employees) to become involved in CSR activities.”
The effects of managerial and employee attributions for corporate social responsibility initiatives (2017, background): “In recognition that the majority of microCSR research is monolevel—whereas CSR is inherently multilevel (Aguinis & Glavas, 2012; Gond et al., 2017)—we develop and test a multilevel mediatedmoderationmodel to help deepen understanding of “how”CSRworks with a focus on leadership and attributional CSR ”