Using the kaleidoscope career model to examine generational differences in work attitudes

By S. Sullivan, Monica L. Forret, Shawn Carraher, Lisa A. Mainiero. 2009

281 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27631236b88ee0be98a248a360fadaf3ccca75ed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Nicky Dries
2. Yehuda Baruch
3. Sean Lyons
4. Alma McCarthy
5. S. Sullivan
6. Eddy S. Ng

In Gender Studies

1. Yehuda Baruch
2. Nicky Dries
3. Sean Lyons
4. S. Sullivan
5. Eddy S. Ng

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Yehuda Baruch
2. Nicky Dries
3. Lisa K. J. Kuron
4. Sean Lyons
5. Alma McCarthy
6. S. Sullivan
7. Eddy S. Ng
8. Jessica L. Hurst

Citations in the corpus

• Generation Y and career choice: The impact of retail career perceptions, expectations and entitlement perceptions (2009, background): “The limited empirical work that compares generations does so in the context of strategically managing multiple generations within a company and there is lack of consensus regarding whether generational differences impact workplace attitudes and behaviors (Sullivan et al., 2009).”
• Work–life balance: One size fits all? An exploratory analysis of the differential effects of career stage (2012, background): “Interestingly Sullivan et al. (2009) when advancing their career model did so on the basis of age while looking at both men and women.”
• The meaning of career success (2011, methodology): “the Kaleidoscope Career Model; Sullivan et al. , 2009”
• Comparing apples to apples: a qualitative investigation of career mobility patterns across four generations (2012, background): “, 1995), the post-corporate career (Peiperl and Baruch, 1997), and the kaleidoscope career (Sullivan et al., 2009), all share commonalities that might be summarized broadly as a modern career archetype.”
• Advances in Career Theory and Research: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Exploration (2009, methodology): “…model have completed a number of studies on the model and have used relatively large sample sizes (e.g., Mainiero & Sullivan, 2006, n > 3,000; Sullivan et al., 2009, n = 908) as well as a variety of methods (e.g., surveys, interviews), further research from independent scholars must be…”