Supporting Literacy Across the Sunshine State: A Study of Florida Middle School Reading Coaches

By Julie A. Marsh, J. McCombs, J. R. Lockwood, Francisco Martorell, Daniel Gershwin, Scott Naftel, Vi-Nhuan Le, Molly V. Shea, Heather Barney, Al Crego. 2008

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18d12c052154884fc13c3ce2bc51f45736ed0036

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

Citations in the corpus

The Effect of Teacher Coaching on Instruction and Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of the Causal Evidence (2018, background): “To date, questions of the effectiveness of individual design features have been explored by only a handful of studies (e.g., Blazar & Kraft, 2015; Marsh et al., 2008; Ramey et al., 2011).”
Instructional Coaching (2010, background): “New reports have called for professional development that helps coaches learn how to support adult learners (Marsh et al., 2008).”
Using Data to Alter Instructional Practice: The Mediating Role of Coaches and Professional Learning Communities (2015, result): “As suggested in past research (Marsh et al., 2008, 2012), we found that a coach’s vertical expertise seemed to be a precondition to enact horizontal expertise with the teachers.”
How the Framing of Instructional Coaching as a Lever for Systemic or Individual Reform Influences the Enactment of Coaching (2015, background): “…to an increase in teacher efficacy (Cantrell & Hughes, 2008), improvements in teaching (Neuman & Cunningham, 2009), and increased student achievement outcomes as measured by standardized tests (Biancarosa et al., 2010; Campbell & Malkus, 2011; Elish-Piper & L’Allier, 2011; Marsh et al., 2008).”
The Effectiveness and Ease of Implementation of an Academic Vocabulary Intervention for Linguistically Diverse Students in Urban Middle Schools (2010, background): “, 2008), that the same adult can be perceived as helpful and essential by one teacher and as evaluative or nonessential by another is a cautionary tale for middle school literacy reform efforts, especially as the literacy coaching model gains momentum across the nation (Hall, 2004; Marsh et al., 200”
Investigating the Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Literacy Coaching Program in Schools with High Teacher Mobility (2010, background): “Marsh et al. (2008) also found a small, significant relationship between how often coaches reviewed assessment data with teachers and student achievement.”
Reading Coaches and the Relationship Between Policy and Practice (2012, background): “Prior research has focused almost exclusively on how coaching functions to help teachers learn new approaches (Bean, 2004; Bean et al., 2010; Deussen et al., 2007; Garet et al., 2008; Marsh et al., 2008; Vanderburg & Stephens, 2010).”
Building Teachers Data-use Capacity: Insights from Strong and Developing Coaches (2014, background): “If teachers are reluctant to work with their coaches, their perceptions of the coach’s effectiveness are diminished (Marsh et al., 2008).”
Three Ways That Literacy Coaches Balance Responsive and Directive Relationships with Teachers (2010, background): “…and professional developers are working to better understand how complex relationships between coaches and teachers relate to changes in teacher practice and gains in student achievement (Hough et al., 2008; Marsh et al., 2008; Peterson, Taylor, Burnham, & Schock, 2009; Rainville & Jones, 2008).”
Assessing the Value-Added Effects of Literacy Collaborative Professional Development on Student Learning (2010, background): “These studies showed minimal (Marsh et al., 2008) or null (Garet et al.”
Leadership for Literacy Coaching: The Principal’s Role in Launching a New Coaching Program (2009, result): “Marsh et al. (2008) similarly found that students in schools where the principals received high ratings for instructional leadership scored 0.7 and 0.6 standard deviations higher in reading and math, respectively, than did students in schools where principals received lower ratings.”