Wim De Neys

General Decision Sciences · 2005–2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 27 researchers and is trusted by 18 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Wim De Neys trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. K. Stanovich
  2. Daniel Kahneman
  3. M. Kane
  4. Jonathan Evans
  5. R. F. West
  6. Amos Tversky
  7. Akira Miyake
  8. Valerie A. Thompson
  9. R. Engle
  10. Keith J. Holyoak

Who trusts Wim De Neys overall

  1. Jonathan Evans
  2. Valerie A. Thompson
  3. Adrian P. Banks
  4. Gordon Pennycook
  5. Joris J. van Hoof
  6. K. Stanovich
  7. Chris Hope
  8. Stephen M. Johnson
  9. Lieven Verschaffel
  10. Tristan Lijnen

Papers from Wim De Neys's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Wim De Neys trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Gone with the wind: Individual differences in heuristics and biases undermine the implication of
  2. Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control
  3. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
  4. Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval. (Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition)
  5. Exploring the Central Executive
  6. The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin
  7. A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. (Journal of experimental psychology. General)
  8. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. (Annual Review of Psychology)
  9. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice
  10. A psychological point of view: Violations of rational rules as a diagnostic of mental processes (Behavioral and Brain Sciences)

Their papers