Stephen M. Johnson

General Decision Sciences · 2000–2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 4 researchers and is trusted by 1 researcher here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Stephen M. Johnson trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Wim De Neys
  2. Jamie I. D. Campbell
  3. Jonathan Evans
  4. Valerie A. Thompson

Who trusts Stephen M. Johnson overall

  1. Jonathan Evans

Papers from Stephen M. Johnson's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Stephen M. Johnson trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Automatic-heuristic and executive-analytic processing during reasoning: Chronometric and dual-task considerations.
  2. Bias and Conflict A Case for Logical Intuitions
  3. MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis (Behavior Research Methods)
  4. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Gone with the wind: Individual differences in heuristics and biases undermine the implication of
  5. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
  6. The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin
  7. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. (Annual Review of Psychology)
  8. On the psychology of prediction
  9. Précis of Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning (Behavioral and Brain Sciences)
  10. Analytic thinking: do you feel like it?

Their papers