Conflict detection, dual processes, and logical intuitions: Some clarifications
By Wim De Neys. 2014
200 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a157c701e36a87693e23be93e515009fc158938
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jonathan Evans
- K. Stanovich
- Keith Frankish
- M. Toplak
- Gordon Pennycook
- Gerben A. van Kleef
- Gary Klein
- Brian W. Miller
In General Decision Sciences
- Jonathan Evans
- K. Stanovich
- Keith Frankish
- Gerben A. van Kleef
- Gary Klein
- Brian W. Miller
- M. Toplak
- Ron Sun
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- Reflections on reflection: the nature and function of type 2 processes in dual-process theories of reasoning (2019, background): “…a variety of techniques in several studies, including neural imaging, De Neys was able to show that such conflict is detected rapidly and preconsciously by participants, even if they give the stereotypical response (for review or relevant studies and theoretical discussion see De Neys, 2012, 2014).”
- On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit (2015, unknown): “This mechanism is linked to what has been labelled as “conflict monitoring” failures (e.g., De Neys, 2014; Penny-cook, Fugelsang & Koehler, 2015).”