The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin

By K. Stanovich. 2004

476 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e50ef2d30d12d8ccddbaadc83aacbbfa15644c05

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Mechanical Engineering

Citations in the corpus

On the distinction between rationality and intelligence: Implications for understanding individual differences in reasoning. (2012, background): “…Over, 1996, 2010; Gigerenzer, 1996; Jungermann, 1986; Kahneman & Tversky, 1983, 1996; Koehler, 1996; Koehler & James, 2009, 2010; Krueger & Funder, 2004; Kuhberger, 2002; Lee, 2006; Samuels & Stich, 2004; Stanovich, 1999, 2004, 2010; Stanovich & West, 2000; Stein, 1996; Stich, 1990; Vranas, 2000).”
Opening up Openness to Experience: A Four-Factor Model and Relations to Creative Achievement in the Arts and Sciences. (2013, unknown): “…2009; Gilhooly & Murphy, 2005; Gilhooly & Fioratou, 2009; Kahneman, 2011; Kahneman & Frederick, 2002, 2005; Lieberman, 2003, 2007; Lin & Lien, 2013; Stanovich, 2004, 2009, 2011; Stanovich & West, 2000; Strack & Deutsch, 2004; Kaufman, 2009a, 2011—but also see Keren and Schul (2009), Kruglanski and…”
The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models (2011, background): “The latter prediction follows from the presumption that many modern problems of rational thinking derive from situations that depart from the environment of evolutionary adaptation (Stanovich, 2004, 2009).”
Reasoned connections: A dual-process perspective on creative thought (2015, background): “Stanovich (2004) distinguishes between the ability (i.e., intelligence, cognitive ability (CA)) and the willingness (i.e., thinking disposition; cognitive style) to engage Type 2 processes.”
The duality of mind: an historical perspective (2009, background): “…called System 1 and System 2, the operations of the former having fast-process characteristics (fast, effortless, automatic, nonconscious, etc.), and those of the latter slow-process ones (slow, effortful, controlled, conscious, etc.) (e.g., Evans and Over 1996; Sloman 1996; Stanovich 1999, 2004).”
The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual-process theory (2014, methodology): “Moreover, Stanovich (2004, 2009) subsequently decomposed System 1 into The Autonomous Set of Systems (TASS) that have in common their fast, automatic, unconscious nature, but which differ in their diverse foci, and decomposed System 2 into the reflective and algorithmic minds.”
The Nature of Self-Improving Artificial Intelligence (2008, background): “Stanovich [38] argues that it is time to rebel against our genes and to make choices by rational deliberation.”
On the failure of cognitive ability to predict myside and one-sided thinking biases (2008, unknown): “…in myside bias than individual difference factors might be understood by using some concepts from dual-process theory (Evans, 1984, 2003, 2006, 2007; Evans & Over, 1996, 2004; Kahneman & Frederick, 2002, 2005; Over, 2002; Reyna, Lloyd, & Brainerd, 2003; Sloman, 1996, 2002; Stanovich, 1999, 2004).”
Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory? (2008, background): “Decoupling operations must be continually in force during any ongoing simulations , and I have conjectured (Stanovich, 2001, 2004) that the raw ability to sustain such mental simulations while keeping the relevant representations decoupled is likely the key aspect of the brain's computational power…”
Motivational Influences on Transfer (2006, background): “This distinction between high-road/conscious application and low-road/automatic application parallels varied dual process theories of cognition that are summarized by Stanovich (2004).”
On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs (2019, background): “A longstanding broad perspective on human cognition holds that reason is, at least to some extent, responsible for accurate belief formation (Baron, 2008; Kohlberg, 1969; Piaget, 1932; Stanovich, 2005).”
Model-free, Model-based, and General Intelligence (2018, unknown): “4[Stanovich, 2005; Heath, 2014].”
The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values (2014, methodology): “Specifically, while researchers in the field of reasoning and decision making tend to emphasise how reflectively questioning intuitions via analytic processing is important in determining behaviour (e.g., Evans, 2009; Kahneman, 2003, 2011; Stanovich, 2004), others have downplayed analytic reasoning,”
Conflict detection, dual processes, and logical intuitions: Some clarifications (2014, background): “Specifically, many of the classic reasoning problems prompt a response from automatic processes, such as linguistic comprehension, stereotyping, belief-evaluation, and imagery Kahneman, 2003; Stanovich, 2004).”
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition (2013, unknown): “Hence, Stanovich (2004, 2009a, 2011) has argued that the execution of Type 1 processes is mandatory when their triggering stimuli are encountered and they are not dependent on input from high-level control systems.”
On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning (2007, methodology): “The idea of dual processes has been applied to deductive reasoning (Evans, 2003, 2006b; Stanovich, 1999, 2004), inductive and statistical reasoning (Kahneman & Frederick, 2002; Klaczynski, 2000, 2001; Sloman, 1996), decision making (Dijksterhuis, Bos, Nordgren, & von Baaren, 2006; Reyna, 2004), and…”