A psychological point of view: Violations of rational rules as a diagnostic of mental processes
By Daniel Kahneman. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2000
192 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e0630885c18859f2cb65718baf20c500d1a6618
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- K. Stanovich
- W. Van Dooren
- Lieven Verschaffel
- Wim De Neys
- R. F. West
- M. Toplak
- Shane Frederick
- Xenia Vamvakoussi
Citations in the corpus
- Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability (2007, background): “Many investigators have noted that within-participants manipulations draw the participant’s attention to the variable of interest (e.g., Fischhoff, Slovic, & Lichtenstein, 1979; Kahneman, 2000; Kahneman & Frederick, 2002; Kahneman & Tversky, 1996; LeBoeuf & Shafir, 2003).”
- What Does It Mean to be Biased: Motivated Reasoning and Rationality (2014, background): “At the time of writing, Tversky and Kahneman’s (1974) Science paper “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases” has over 19,000 citations on Google Scholar, and their (1979) paper on decision-making over 28,000, with the majority of these outside of”
- Evolutionary versus instrumental goals: How evolutionary psychology misconceives human rationality (2003, background): “…the heuristics and biases literature (Funder, 1987; Gigerenzer, 1996a; Hastie & Rasinski, 1988; Kruglanski & Ajzen, 1983), but in fact it was always the position of the original heuristics and biases researchers themselves (Kahneman, 2000; Kahneman & Tversky, 1973, 1996; Tversky & Kahneman, 1974).”
- The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models (2011, background): “We have also concentrated on the classic dual-process views that derive from Evans (1984, 1989, 2003) and Tversky and Kahneman (1974; Kahneman, 2000; Kahneman & Frederick, 2002).”
- The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (2011, methodology): “This problem was taken from Kahneman and Tversky (1982). Participants were told that a game of squash can be played to either 9 or 15 points.”
- Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition (2013, unknown): “The original heuristics and biases researchers were clear that they deliberately designed tasks in order to put two response tendencies in conflict (see Kahneman, 2000, 2011; Kahneman & Frederick, 2002).”
- Automatic-heuristic and executive-analytic processing during reasoning: Chronometric and dual-task considerations. (2006, methodology): “The heuristic system is assumed to operate faster than the analytic system (e.g., Epstein, 1994; Evans & Over, 1996; Goel, 1995; Kahneman, 2000; Sloman, 1996; Stanovich, 1999).”
- On the failure of cognitive ability to predict myside and one-sided thinking biases (2008, background): “…paradigm, because it is run within subjects, contains cues that might help participants interpret what the experimenter might deem optimal performance (see Fischhoff, Slovic, & Lichtenstein, 1979; Kahneman, 2000; Kahneman & Frederick, 2002, 2005; Kahneman & Tversky, 1996; LeBoeuf & Shafir, 2003).”
- Dual Processes in the Psychology of Mathematics Education and Cognitive Psychology (2009, background): “Within cognitive psychology, dual-process theories [e.g., Epstein, 1994; Evans & Over, 1996; Kahneman, 2000; Sloman, 1996; Stanovich, 1999] arose to account for such errors.”