Automatic-heuristic and executive-analytic processing during reasoning: Chronometric and dual-task considerations.
By Wim De Neys. 2006
208 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb8976724dacd9dd9496ce22b6f57cf9b765f642
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jonathan Evans
- K. Stanovich
- Wim De Neys
- W. Van Dooren
- Lieven Verschaffel
- Joris J. van Hoof
- Valerie A. Thompson
- Samuel Franssens
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Jonathan Evans
- K. Stanovich
- Wim De Neys
- Lieven Verschaffel
- Valerie A. Thompson
- Stephen M. Johnson
- W. Van Dooren
- Joris J. van Hoof
In General Decision Sciences
- Jonathan Evans
- Wim De Neys
- K. Stanovich
- Valerie A. Thompson
- Stephen M. Johnson
- W. Van Dooren
- Lieven Verschaffel
- Samuel Franssens
Citations in the corpus
- Conflict, metacognition, and analytic thinking (2014, background): “Indeed, one of the challenges going forward is to reconcile these data with the findings that a dual task disrupts the ability to produce normative answers and encourages production of Type 1 responses (e.g., De Neys, 2006; Gilhooly, 2005).”
- Dual Processes in the Psychology of Mathematics Education and Cognitive Psychology (2009, background): “Recently, De Neys, Vartanian, and Goel [2008] reported neurological evidence concerning the conflict monitoring issue for base rate neglect problems that clearly pointed out that it is more a matter of response inhibition than of conflict detection.”
- Are secondary school students still hampered by the natural number bias? A reaction time study on fraction comparison tasks (2013, methodology): “Our third and final research question was: Do students in their first and fifth years of secondary education detect a conflict between their initial natural-number biased reasoning and the correct reasoning when they make mistakes on incongruent items? This question was based on the dual process the”
- Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory? (2008, background): “Such decoupling is an important aspect of behavioral control that is related to rationality (see De Neys, 2006a, 2006b).”
- Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition (2013, unknown): “2), is found to be increased by use of speeded tasks (Roberts & Newton, 2001) or concurrent working memory loads (De Neys, 2006a).”
- The effortless nature of conflict detection during thinking (2009, background): “In the load condition the participants had to make their judgements while performing a visuospatial secondary task (De Neys, 2006a; 2006b; De Neys & Verschueren, 2006; Verschueren, Schaeken & d’Ydewalle, 2004).”
- On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning (2007, methodology): “Yet another method involves the post hoc separation of slow and fast response trials to differentiate different responses based on analytic and heuristic processing respectively (De Neys, 2006a; Verschueren, Schaeken, & d’Ydewalle, 2005).”