Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition.

By Jonathan Evans. Annual Review of Psychology, 2008

4,839 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81445052dfd839de284c0ea0225ee2855df15038

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In General Decision Sciences

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Environmental cognitions, land change, and social–ecological feedbacks: an overview (2013, background): “Current decision-making theories often articulate two types of processes, one based on slow, controlled and effortful reasoning and the other on automatic or intuitive judgments made using heuristics and emotions (Kahneman and Frederick 2002 ; Evans 2008 ; Table 1 ).”
Psychology Models of Management Accounting (2010, background): “Zhang (2008) uses Towry’s mutual-monitoring setting to test the ex post suggestion in Evans et al. (2001) that individuals will report more honestly when they believe that their compensation is fair.”
The psychological roots of intellectual humility: The role of intelligence and cognitive flexibility (2019, background): “…corollary of this dual-systems approach is that in order to reason intelligently and avoid biased thinking, it is necessary to engage System 2 processes which are deliberate and analytical, and to override the automatic biases that are assumed to emerge from System 1 processes (Evans, 2003, 2008).”
Evolutionary Political Psychology: On the Origin and Structure of Heuristics and Biases in Politics (2015, background): “…argued that these pioneers in fact separated two types of the same fundamental process and missed the existence of the truly alternative process (see Evans, 2008: 267–268): that some heuristics are not “learned” (in the sense of being acquired through logical deduction or explicit instruction)…”
A Dispositional Approach to Attitudes: Thinking Outside of the Belief Box (2013, background): “Broad-based dispositionalism thus encourages less pleasant but more salutary self-portraits: On the largest, most morally significant, life-permeating 14 On System 1 vs. System 2, see Frankish 2004; Evans 2008 – not that Frankish or Evans endorse the style of reasoning I criticize here.”
Dual Process Theories in Behavioral Economics and Neuroeconomics: a Critical Review (2019, background): “Yet, the consensus among many researchers, at least in the areas of reasoning and decision-making, is that this latter view is untenable (cf. Evans 2008; Keren and Schul 2009).6 The reason why many seem to resist the parallel-competitive model of system interaction is because it requires a more…”
Performance on the Cognitive Reflection Test is stable across time (2018, background): “…dual-process theory, decision making involves two different types of cognitive processes: one that relies on intuition (Type 1), and one that relies on deliberation (Type 2) (Evans, 2008; Frankish & Evans, 2009; Kahneman, 2003; Sloman, 1996; Evans & Franklin, 2009; Kahneman, 2013; Stanovich, 2013).”
Systems and levels: Dual-system theories and the personal- subpersonal distinction ∗ (2009, background): “…of two types of processing in human reasoning, decision making, and social cognition — one type fast, automatic, effortless, and non-conscious, the other slow, controlled, effortful, and conscious — which may deliver different and sometimes conflicting results (for a review, see Evans 2008).”