Hock-Peng Sin

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management · 2004–2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 27 researchers and is trusted by 27 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Hock-Peng Sin trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. P. Bliese
  2. L. R. Goldberg
  3. Craig K. Enders
  4. John R. Austin
  5. J. Crant
  6. Katherine J Klein
  7. Alicia A. Grandey
  8. Reagan D. Brown
  9. C. Viswesvaran
  10. Sharon K. Parker

Who trusts Hock-Peng Sin overall

  1. D. Day
  2. Adam M. Grant
  3. R. Lord
  4. D. Miščenko
  5. David M. LaHuis
  6. Natalie J. Allen
  7. Alicia A. Grandey
  8. O. Epitropaki
  9. Michael S. Cole
  10. Sebastian C. Schuh

Papers from Hock-Peng Sin's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Hock-Peng Sin trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis.
  2. Proactive Behavior in Organizations
  3. Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  4. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.
  5. Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle? (Psychological bulletin)
  6. 4. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century
  7. Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of "people work"
  8. Charismatic leadership viewed from above: the impact of proactive personality
  9. Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  10. WHEN 'THE SHOW MUST GO ON': SURFACE ACTING AND DEEP ACTING AS DETERMINANTS OF EMOTIONAL EXHAUSTION AND PEER-RATED SERVICE DELIVERY

Their papers