Longitudinal tests of an integrative model of leader development: Charting and understanding developmental trajectories☆
By D. Day, Hock-Peng Sin. 2011
237 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e439eb6e86acc38b6bba25c6972f5679c4ffda1c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Leadership and followership identity processes: A multilevel review ☆ (2017, methodology): “According to Day and Sin (2011), an important aspect of this proposed leader identity-development spiral is that it is a dynamic process of internalization (or rejection) of the leader identity (Tice, 1992).”
- Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives (2014, background): “This approach ignores the cumulated effects of transitory processes, such as emotions, thoughts, reactions, and embodied cognitions, which can fundamentally alter leader development and behavioral outcomes (Day & Sin, 2011; Lord, Hannah, & Jennings, 2011).”
- Leadership coaching, leader role-efficacy, and trust in subordinates. A mixed methods study assessing leadership coaching as a leadership development tool (2014, unknown): “We argue that LRE is similar to LSE yet is a less behavior-specific construct, thus enabling comparison of leaders across different organizational contexts and hierarchical levels as these will need to exhibit different leadership behaviors to be effective (Conger & Fishel, 2007; Day & Sin, 2011).”
- Serving You Depletes Me? A Leader-Centric Examination of Servant Leadership Behaviors (2020, background): “Indeed, within-person daily approaches can help to uncover the dynamic process of leadership, which is believed to be critical to leadership research in the new millennium (Day & Sin, 2011; Dinh, Lord, Gardner, Meuser, Liden, & Hu, 2014).”
- Am I a Leader? Examining Leader Identity Development Over Time (2017, methodology): “Consistent with previous conceptual contributions (Day et al., 2009; DeRue & Ashford, 2010) and initial empirical evidence (Day & Sin, 2011), we find that leader identity develops in a curvilinear fashion.”
- Time in Individual-Level Organizational Studies: What is it, How is it Used, and Why Isn't it Exploited More Often? (2015, background): “…adaptation (Bhaskar-Shrinivas et al. 2005, Firth et al. 2014), goal setting (e.g., Ilies & Judge 2005, Schmidt &DeShon 2007, Schmidt et al. 2009), leadership development (Day & Sin 2011, Nahrgang et al. 2009), and task and contextual performance (e.g., Spence et al. 2011, Sturman & Trevor 2001).”
- What Have We Learned That Is Critical in Understanding Leadership Perceptions and Leader-Performance Relations? (2014, background): “Complicating the picture further, Day’s (2012) work on leadership development indicates that most leaders believe leadership skills are learned through experience, and leadership development may take a long time and follow different trajectories for different individuals (Day & Sin, 2011).”
- Protean Careers at Work: Self-Direction and Values Orientation in Psychological Success (2018, background): “Similarly, research on adult development has shown that development is a dynamic process that involves both gains and loss in identities and meaning-making structures over time (Baltes 1987, Day & Sin 2011).”
- Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25years of research and theory (2014, background): “Another important difference is that the nature of leadership development is inherently multilevel and longitudinal (Day, 2011).”
- Model of complexity leadership development (2013, background): “…the developmental process by which leader proficiency in these skills evolves, has been recognized as involving a deeper-level personal transformation associated with leader identity formation as leaders increasingly become aware of themselves (Day, Harrison, and Halpin 2009; Day and Sin 2011).”