Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice.

By Kurt T. Dirks, Donald L. Ferrin. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002

3,551 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f15b4c70e6a0fb9ce8ab0c916573f45d4b6f4bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. (2013, neutral): “…meta-analyses had already been published on a given relationship (e.g., Berry, Ones, & Sackett, 2007; Colquitt, Scott, & LePine, 2007; Dalal, 2005; Dirks & Ferrin, 2002; Gerstner & Day, 1997; Ilies et al., 2007; LePine, Erez, & Johnson, 2002; Meyer, Stanley, Herscovitch, & Topolnytsky, 2002;…”
Exploring how instructional leadership affects teacher efficacy: A multilevel analysis (2021, background): “A number of studies found that trust in the administrator mediates the relations between transformational leadership and faculty attitudes (Chun et al., 2009; Dirks and Ferrin, 2002; Walumbwa et al, 2005).”
The Role of Perceived Organizational Support in Individual Change Readiness (2019, background): “Employee trust has been associated with positive workplace outcomes such as organizational commitment, citizenship behaviours, intentions to remain, and job satisfaction (Aryee et al., 2002; Ferrin & Dirks, 2002).”
“Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development (2005, background): “Recall that Lord, Brown and associates, building on the work of Brewer & Gardner (1996), differentiate between the individual (independent), interpersonal (relational), and collective levels of identity, with the latter two levels reflecting social identities. Leadership has its most powerful effect”
Work Engagement: Antecedents, the Mediating Role of Learning Goal Orientation and Job Performance. (2011, background): “Although the relationship between trust and other indicators of motivation such as, job satisfaction, organisational citizenship behaviour and turnover intentions is well documented in the literature ( Dirks and Ferrin, 2002”
Uncertainty during Organizational Change: Managing Perceptions through Communication (2007, methodology): “This is somewhat surprising, given the existing research that has demonstrated that trust in leadership is associated with a range of positive organizational behaviours, in addition to a willingness to believe that the organization or management are acting in the best interests of employees (Dirks a”
In justice we trust: Exploring knowledge-sharing continuance intentions in virtual communities of practice (2010, background): “Indeed, some scholars suggest that the relative importance of trust in leadership or other referents, such as peers, and different associations should be further examined (Dirks & Ferrin, 2002).”
It hurts both ways: How social comparisons harm affective and cognitive trust (2012, methodology): “Cognitive trust is a willingness to be vulnerable to the trustee that is based primarily on beliefs about the trustee’s ability and integrity (Chua et al., 2008; Dirks & Ferrin, 2002; Mayer et al., 1995; McAllister, 1995; Wilson et al., 2006).”
Interpersonal trust within negotiations: : Meta-analytic evidence, critical contingencies, and directions for future research. (2014, methodology): “This model has been validated using data from a range of organizational settings and work relationships (Colquitt, Scott, & LePine, 2007; Dirks & Ferrin, 2002).”
Ethical leadership and trust: It's all about meeting expectations (2009, background): “Dirks and Ferrin (2002) found that the most important antecedents for trust in leaders are leadership style and practices, in particular transformational leadership, perceived organizational support, and interactional justice.”
Exploring predictors of organizational identification: Moderating role of trust on the associations between empowerment, organizational support, and identification (2010, background): “Dirks and Ferrin ( 2002 ) also called for more research in the area of cognition- and affect-based trust, and thus the present study extends the previous literature by investigating the differential moderating roles of cognition-based trust and affect-based trust on the associations among psychologi”
Can I Trust You to Trust Me? (2007, background): “…trust literature often hypothesize that in contexts such as interpersonal work relationships and negotiations, trust will lead to numerous cooperative behaviors and outcomes such as job performance, organizational citizenship behaviors, and cooperative agreements (Dirks & Ferrin, 2001, 2002).”