How Do Missing Data Bias Estimates of Within-Group Agreement? Sensitivity of SD WG, CVWG, rWG(J), rWG(J) * , and ICC to Systematic Nonresponse
By Daniel A. Newman, Hock-Peng Sin. 2009
88 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e58c09c72e221867de30edbd0fb3a5c3e980dfee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Manuela Priesemuth
- Marshall Schminke
- Michael S. Cole
- Maureen L. Ambrose
- Robert Folger
- B. Vogel
- Robert R. Hirschfeld
- A. Bedeian
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Considering diversity: The positive effects of considerate leadership in diverse teams (2013, unknown): “Indeed, a comparison of our sample with the organization’s population showed that it did not differ in terms of sex, age, ethnicity, educational background, or tenure, which alleviates concerns regarding nonresponse (Newman & Sin, 2009; Schafer & Graham, 2002).”
- Dispersion-Composition Models in Multilevel Research (2011, background): “Nonetheless, what we do know (Newman & Sin, 2009) is that the estimation of group-level properties is complicated when within-group response rates fall below 100% (a very common occurrence in field research).”
- Abusive supervision climate: : A multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes (2014, background): “…suggests that three to five employees from a work unit provide sufficient responses for assessing a workgroup (Colquitt, Noe, & Jackson, 2002; Newman & Sin, 2009; Richardson & Vandenberg, 2005; Schminke, Ambrose, & Neubaum, 2005; Schneider, Hanges, Smith, & Salvaggio, 2003; Schneider,…”