Implicit and Explicit Components of Prejudice

By Markus Brauer, Wolfgang Wasel, Paula M. Niedenthal. 2000

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71159310c24184feda317cec01fdc8f57b7e426a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Using the Implicit Association Test to investigate attitude-behaviour consistency for stigmatised behaviour (2001, background): “For the most part, the relationship between implicit and explicit measures of affect and beliefs toward various social groups is weak (Brauer et al., 2000).”
The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: the role of motivations to respond without prejudice. (2002, unknown): “construct (Bosson, Swann, & Pennebaker, 2000; Brauer, Wasel, & Niedenthal, 2000 ).”
The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review (2007, background): “Some research efforts have identified relevant differences in measurement methods to clarify the relations among implicit measures (e.g., Brauer, Wasel, & Niedenthal, 2000; Olson & Fazio, 2003).”
Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. (2003, background): “Brauer et al. (2000) observed a small, albeit significant, correlation of .27 between two versions of a priming measure of attitudes toward women, one based on a lexical-decision task and one based on an adjective-connotation task.”
Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. (2002, background): “A central theme in research on unconscious processes is the relationship between such measures and relatively more conscious measures (Banaji, Lemm, & Carpenter, 2001; Blair, 2001; Brauer, Wasal, & Niedenthal, 2000; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995).”
Using the Implicit Association Test to Measure Self-Esteem and Self-Concept (2000, result): “The evidence of construct divergence between implicit and explicit measures is, by now, a familiar pattern in studies that include both types of measures (e.g., Bosson et al., 2000; Brauer, Wasel, & Niedenthal, 2000; Devine, 1989; Dovidio, Kawakami, Johnson, Johnson, & Howard, 1997; Greenwald & Ba”
Experimental research on just-world theory: problems, developments, and future challenges. (2005, methodology): “The theory and methods of people’s implicit psychology, although presently popular in other areas of personality and social psychology (e.g., Brauer et al., 2000; Koole, Dijksterhuis, & van Knippenberg, 2001; Woike, Lavezzary, & Barsky, 2001), have not been influential in social justice research…”
Predictive Validity of the Implicit Association Test in Studies of Brands, Consumer Attitudes, and Behavior (2004, unknown): “These processes have been mostly studied in the context of stereotypes and prejudices (Bargh, 1989; Bargh, 1997; Bargh, Chaiken, Govender, & Pratto, 1992; Brauer, Wasel, & Niedenthal, 2000; Devine, 1989; Fazio, Sanbonmatsu, Powell, & Kardes, 1986; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995; Pratto, 1994).”
Implicit Attitude Measures: Consistency, Stability, and Convergent Validity (2001, background): “Research on relationships between implicit and explicit attitudes, however, has resulted in inconclusive observations: As many studies have reported relationships as have not (for reviews, see Blair, in press; Brauer et al., 2000).”
Implicit attitudes towards native and non-native speaker teachers (2009, background): “Instead, research methodologies specifically designed to investigate implicit constructs are needed (Brauer et al., 2000).”
TARGET ARTICLE: Attributions of Implicit Prejudice, or "Would Jesse Jackson 'Fail' the Implicit Association Test?" (2004, unknown): “For example, Brauer et al. (2000) reviewed studies in which a relation between implicit and explicit prejudice had been tested.”
Gender differences in implicit prejudice. (2003, background): “The argument for this procedure has probably been the assumption of the ‘‘male default’’ (Brauer et al., 2000; Kawakami & Dovidio, 2001; Zarate & Sandoval, 1995), which in the present context means that stereotypes of prejudiced groups are by default linked to the men rather than the women.”
Imagining stereotypes away: the moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. (2001, background): “Several researchers have begun to question the assumption that all implicit measures reveal the same processes, with calls to analyze their structural properties more thoroughly (Bosson, Swann, & Pennebaker, 2000; Brauer, Wasel, & Niedenthal, 2000; De Houwer, 2000; but see Cunningham, Preacher, & ”
When and why do implicit measures predict behaviour? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance (2008, background): “In a related vein, more research is needed on the interrelations of the various implicit measures in order to extend the scarce theoretical and empirical evidence in this area (for notable contributions see Bosson, Swann, & Pennebaker, 2000 ; Brauer, Wasel, & Niedenthal, 2000 ; Cunningham, Preache”